RFC 132 Typographical Error in RFC 107

[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker]

Obsoleted by: 154

NETWORK WORKING GROUP                                           Jim White
Request for Comments #132                                       UCSB
NIC #6708                                                       April 28, 1971






                     TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107
                     ______________________________


On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V.
Flow Control', the partial sentence:

     Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number
     of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned
     if it is in the range zero to 128...

should read:

     ...if it is the range of zero to 127,...
                                      ---

That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and
only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding
fraction is 1.


       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
     [ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ]



















                                                                [Page 1]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/