[Docs] [txt|pdf] [draft-ietf-snmp...] [Tracker] [Diff1] [Diff2]
Obsoleted by: 2578 DRAFT STANDARD
Network Working Group SNMPv2 Working Group
Request for Comments: 1902 J. Case
Obsoletes: 1442 SNMP Research, Inc.
Category: Standards Track K. McCloghrie
Cisco Systems, Inc.
M. Rose
Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
S. Waldbusser
International Network Services
January 1996
Structure of Management Information
for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
1. Introduction
A management system contains: several (potentially many) nodes, each
with a processing entity, termed an agent, which has access to
management instrumentation; at least one management station; and, a
management protocol, used to convey management information between
the agents and management stations. Operations of the protocol are
carried out under an administrative framework which defines
authentication, authorization, access control, and privacy policies.
Management stations execute management applications which monitor and
control managed elements. Managed elements are devices such as
hosts, routers, terminal servers, etc., which are monitored and
controlled via access to their management information.
Management information is viewed as a collection of managed objects,
residing in a virtual information store, termed the Management
Information Base (MIB). Collections of related objects are defined
in MIB modules. These modules are written using an adapted subset of
OSI's Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [1]. It is the purpose of
this document, the Structure of Management Information (SMI), to
define that adapted subset, and to assign a set of associated
administrative values.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
The SMI is divided into three parts: module definitions, object
definitions, and, notification definitions.
(1) Module definitions are used when describing information modules.
An ASN.1 macro, MODULE-IDENTITY, is used to concisely convey the
semantics of an information module.
(2) Object definitions are used when describing managed objects. An
ASN.1 macro, OBJECT-TYPE, is used to concisely convey the syntax
and semantics of a managed object.
(3) Notification definitions are used when describing unsolicited
transmissions of management information. An ASN.1 macro,
NOTIFICATION-TYPE, is used to concisely convey the syntax and
semantics of a notification.
1.1. A Note on Terminology
For the purpose of exposition, the original Internet-standard Network
Management Framework, as described in RFCs 1155 (STD 16), 1157 (STD
15), and 1212 (STD 16), is termed the SNMP version 1 framework
(SNMPv1). The current framework is termed the SNMP version 2
framework (SNMPv2).
2. Definitions
SNMPv2-SMI DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
-- the path to the root
org OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso 3 }
dod OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { org 6 }
internet OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dod 1 }
directory OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 1 }
mgmt OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 2 }
mib-2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mgmt 1 }
transmission OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mib-2 10 }
experimental OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 3 }
private OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 4 }
enterprises OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { private 1 }
security OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 5 }
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
snmpV2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 6 }
-- transport domains
snmpDomains OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpV2 1 }
-- transport proxies
snmpProxys OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpV2 2 }
-- module identities
snmpModules OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpV2 3 }
-- definitions for information modules
MODULE-IDENTITY MACRO ::=
BEGIN
TYPE NOTATION ::=
"LAST-UPDATED" value(Update UTCTime)
"ORGANIZATION" Text
"CONTACT-INFO" Text
"DESCRIPTION" Text
RevisionPart
VALUE NOTATION ::=
value(VALUE OBJECT IDENTIFIER)
RevisionPart ::=
Revisions
| empty
Revisions ::=
Revision
| Revisions Revision
Revision ::=
"REVISION" value(Update UTCTime)
"DESCRIPTION" Text
-- uses the NVT ASCII character set
Text ::= """" string """"
END
OBJECT-IDENTITY MACRO ::=
BEGIN
TYPE NOTATION ::=
"STATUS" Status
"DESCRIPTION" Text
ReferPart
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
VALUE NOTATION ::=
value(VALUE OBJECT IDENTIFIER)
Status ::=
"current"
| "deprecated"
| "obsolete"
ReferPart ::=
"REFERENCE" Text
| empty
Text ::= """" string """"
END
-- names of objects
ObjectName ::=
OBJECT IDENTIFIER
NotificationName ::=
OBJECT IDENTIFIER
-- syntax of objects
ObjectSyntax ::=
CHOICE {
simple
SimpleSyntax,
-- note that SEQUENCEs for conceptual tables and
-- rows are not mentioned here...
application-wide
ApplicationSyntax
}
-- built-in ASN.1 types
SimpleSyntax ::=
CHOICE {
-- INTEGERs with a more restrictive range
-- may also be used
integer-value -- includes Integer32
INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647),
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
-- OCTET STRINGs with a more restrictive size
-- may also be used
string-value
OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..65535)),
objectID-value
OBJECT IDENTIFIER
}
-- indistinguishable from INTEGER, but never needs more than
-- 32-bits for a two's complement representation
Integer32 ::=
[UNIVERSAL 2]
IMPLICIT INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)
-- application-wide types
ApplicationSyntax ::=
CHOICE {
ipAddress-value
IpAddress,
counter-value
Counter32,
timeticks-value
TimeTicks,
arbitrary-value
Opaque,
big-counter-value
Counter64,
unsigned-integer-value -- includes Gauge32
Unsigned32
}
-- in network-byte order
-- (this is a tagged type for historical reasons)
IpAddress ::=
[APPLICATION 0]
IMPLICIT OCTET STRING (SIZE (4))
-- this wraps
Counter32 ::=
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
[APPLICATION 1]
IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295)
-- this doesn't wrap
Gauge32 ::=
[APPLICATION 2]
IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295)
-- an unsigned 32-bit quantity
-- indistinguishable from Gauge32
Unsigned32 ::=
[APPLICATION 2]
IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295)
-- hundredths of seconds since an epoch
TimeTicks ::=
[APPLICATION 3]
IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295)
-- for backward-compatibility only
Opaque ::=
[APPLICATION 4]
IMPLICIT OCTET STRING
-- for counters that wrap in less than one hour with only 32 bits
Counter64 ::=
[APPLICATION 6]
IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..18446744073709551615)
-- definition for objects
OBJECT-TYPE MACRO ::=
BEGIN
TYPE NOTATION ::=
"SYNTAX" Syntax
UnitsPart
"MAX-ACCESS" Access
"STATUS" Status
"DESCRIPTION" Text
ReferPart
IndexPart
DefValPart
VALUE NOTATION ::=
value(VALUE ObjectName)
Syntax ::=
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
type(ObjectSyntax)
| "BITS" "{" Kibbles "}"
Kibbles ::=
Kibble
| Kibbles "," Kibble
Kibble ::=
identifier "(" nonNegativeNumber ")"
UnitsPart ::=
"UNITS" Text
| empty
Access ::=
"not-accessible"
| "accessible-for-notify"
| "read-only"
| "read-write"
| "read-create"
Status ::=
"current"
| "deprecated"
| "obsolete"
ReferPart ::=
"REFERENCE" Text
| empty
IndexPart ::=
"INDEX" "{" IndexTypes "}"
| "AUGMENTS" "{" Entry "}"
| empty
IndexTypes ::=
IndexType
| IndexTypes "," IndexType
IndexType ::=
"IMPLIED" Index
| Index
Index ::=
-- use the SYNTAX value of the
-- correspondent OBJECT-TYPE invocation
value(Indexobject ObjectName)
Entry ::=
-- use the INDEX value of the
-- correspondent OBJECT-TYPE invocation
value(Entryobject ObjectName)
DefValPart ::=
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
"DEFVAL" "{" value(Defval Syntax) "}"
| empty
-- uses the NVT ASCII character set
Text ::= """" string """"
END
-- definitions for notifications
NOTIFICATION-TYPE MACRO ::=
BEGIN
TYPE NOTATION ::=
ObjectsPart
"STATUS" Status
"DESCRIPTION" Text
ReferPart
VALUE NOTATION ::=
value(VALUE NotificationName)
ObjectsPart ::=
"OBJECTS" "{" Objects "}"
| empty
Objects ::=
Object
| Objects "," Object
Object ::=
value(Name ObjectName)
Status ::=
"current"
| "deprecated"
| "obsolete"
ReferPart ::=
"REFERENCE" Text
| empty
-- uses the NVT ASCII character set
Text ::= """" string """"
END
-- definitions of administrative identifiers
zeroDotZero OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
"A value used for null identifiers."
::= { 0 0 }
END
3. Information Modules
An "information module" is an ASN.1 module defining information
relating to network management.
The SMI describes how to use a subset of ASN.1 to define an
information module. Further, additional restrictions are placed on
"standard" information modules. It is strongly recommended that
"enterprise-specific" information modules also adhere to these
restrictions.
Typically, there are three kinds of information modules:
(1) MIB modules, which contain definitions of inter-related managed
objects, make use of the OBJECT-TYPE and NOTIFICATION-TYPE macros;
(2) compliance statements for MIB modules, which make use of the
MODULE-COMPLIANCE and OBJECT-GROUP macros [2]; and,
(3) capability statements for agent implementations which make use of
the AGENT-CAPABILITIES macros [2].
This classification scheme does not imply a rigid taxonomy. For
example, a "standard" information module will normally include
definitions of managed objects and a compliance statement.
Similarly, an "enterprise-specific" information module might include
definitions of managed objects and a capability statement. Of
course, a "standard" information module may not contain capability
statements.
The constructs of ASN.1 allowed in SNMPv2 information modules
include: the IMPORTS clause, value definitions for OBJECT
IDENTIFIERs, type definitions for SEQUENCEs (with restrictions),
ASN.1 type assignments of the restricted ASN.1 types allowed in
SNMPv2, and instances of ASN.1 macros defined in this document and in
other documents [2, 3] of the SNMPv2 framework. Additional ASN.1
macros may not be defined in SNMPv2 information modules.
The names of all standard information modules must be unique (but
different versions of the same information module should have the
same name). Developers of enterprise information modules are
encouraged to choose names for their information modules that will
have a low probability of colliding with standard or other enterprise
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
information modules. An information module may not use the ASN.1
construct of placing an object identifier value between the module
name and the "DEFINITIONS" keyword.
All information modules start with exactly one invocation of the
MODULE-IDENTITY macro, which provides contact information as well as
revision history to distinguish between versions of the same
information module. This invocation must appear immediately after
any IMPORTs statements.
3.1. Macro Invocation
Within an information module, each macro invocation appears as:
<descriptor> <macro> <clauses> ::= <value>
where <descriptor> corresponds to an ASN.1 identifier, <macro> names
the macro being invoked, and <clauses> and <value> depend on the
definition of the macro. (Note that this definition of a descriptor
applies to all macros defined in this memo and in [2].)
For the purposes of this specification, an ASN.1 identifier consists
of one or more letters or digits, and its initial character must be a
lower-case letter. (Note that hyphens are not allowed by this
specification, even though hyphen is allowed by [1]. This
restriction enables arithmetic expressions in languages which use the
minus sign to reference these descriptors without ambiguity.)
For all descriptors appearing in an information module, the
descriptor shall be unique and mnemonic, and shall not exceed 64
characters in length. (However, descriptors longer than 32
characters are not recommended.) This promotes a common language for
humans to use when discussing the information module and also
facilitates simple table mappings for user-interfaces.
The set of descriptors defined in all "standard" information modules
shall be unique.
Finally, by convention, if the descriptor refers to an object with a
SYNTAX clause value of either Counter32 or Counter64, then the
descriptor used for the object should denote plurality.
3.1.1. Textual Clauses
Some clauses in a macro invocation may take a textual value (e.g.,
the DESCRIPTION clause). Note that, in order to conform to the ASN.1
syntax, the entire value of these clauses must be enclosed in double
quotation marks, and therefore cannot itself contain double quotation
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
marks, although the value may be multi-line.
3.2. IMPORTing Symbols
To reference an external object, the IMPORTS statement must be used
to identify both the descriptor and the module in which the
descriptor is defined, where the module is identified by its ASN.1
module name.
Note that when symbols from "enterprise-specific" information modules
are referenced (e.g., a descriptor), there is the possibility of
collision. As such, if different objects with the same descriptor
are IMPORTed, then this ambiguity is resolved by prefixing the
descriptor with the name of the information module and a dot ("."),
i.e.,
"module.descriptor"
(All descriptors must be unique within any information module.)
Of course, this notation can be used even when there is no collision
when IMPORTing symbols.
Finally, the IMPORTS statement may not be used to import an ASN.1
named type which corresponds to either the SEQUENCE or SEQUENCE OF
type.
3.3. Exporting Symbols
The ASN.1 EXPORTS statement is not allowed in SNMPv2 information
modules. All items defined in an information module are
automatically exported.
3.4. ASN.1 Comments
Comments in ASN.1 commence with a pair of adjacent hyphens and end
with the next pair of adjacent hyphens or at the end of the line,
whichever occurs first.
3.5. OBJECT IDENTIFIER values
An OBJECT IDENTIFIER value is an ordered list of non-negative
numbers. For the SNMPv2 framework, each number in the list is
referred to as a sub-identifier, there are at most 128 sub-
identifiers in a value, and each sub-identifier has a maximum value
of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal). All OBJECT IDENTIFIER values have at
least two sub-identifiers, where the value of the first sub-
identifier is one of the following well-known names:
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
Value Name
0 ccitt
1 iso
2 joint-iso-ccitt
4. Naming Hierarchy
The root of the subtree administered by the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority (IANA) for the Internet is:
internet OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso 3 6 1 }
That is, the Internet subtree of OBJECT IDENTIFIERs starts with the
prefix:
1.3.6.1.
Several branches underneath this subtree are used for network
management:
mgmt OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 2 }
experimental OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 3 }
private OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { internet 4 }
enterprises OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { private 1 }
However, the SMI does not prohibit the definition of objects in other
portions of the object tree.
The mgmt(2) subtree is used to identify "standard" objects.
The experimental(3) subtree is used to identify objects being
designed by working groups of the IETF. If an information module
produced by a working group becomes a "standard" information module,
then at the very beginning of its entry onto the Internet standards
track, the objects are moved under the mgmt(2) subtree.
The private(4) subtree is used to identify objects defined
unilaterally. The enterprises(1) subtree beneath private is used,
among other things, to permit providers of networking subsystems to
register models of their products.
5. Mapping of the MODULE-IDENTITY macro
The MODULE-IDENTITY macro is used to provide contact and revision
history for each information module. It must appear exactly once in
every information module. It should be noted that the expansion of
the MODULE-IDENTITY macro is something which conceptually happens
during implementation and not during run-time.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
Note that reference in an IMPORTS clause or in clauses of SNMPv2
macros to an information module is NOT through the use of the
'descriptor' of a MODULE-IDENTITY macro; rather, an information
module is referenced through specifying its module name.
5.1. Mapping of the LAST-UPDATED clause
The LAST-UPDATED clause, which must be present, contains the date and
time that this information module was last edited. The date and time
are represented in UTC Time format (see Appendix B).
5.2. Mapping of the ORGANIZATION clause
The ORGANIZATION clause, which must be present, contains a textual
description of the organization under whose auspices this information
module was developed.
5.3. Mapping of the CONTACT-INFO clause
The CONTACT-INFO clause, which must be present, contains the name,
postal address, telephone number, and electronic mail address of the
person to whom technical queries concerning this information module
should be sent.
5.4. Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause
The DESCRIPTION clause, which must be present, contains a high-level
textual description of the contents of this information module.
5.5. Mapping of the REVISION clause
The REVISION clause, which need not be present, is repeatedly used to
describe the revisions (including the initial version) made to this
information module, in reverse chronological order (i.e., most recent
first). Each instance of this clause contains the date and time of
the revision. The date and time are represented in UTC Time format
(see Appendix B).
5.5.1. Mapping of the DESCRIPTION sub-clause
The DESCRIPTION clause, which must be present for each REVISION
clause, contains a high-level textual description of the revision
identified in that REVISION clause.
5.6. Mapping of the MODULE-IDENTITY value
The value of an invocation of the MODULE-IDENTITY macro is an OBJECT
IDENTIFIER. As such, this value may be authoritatively used when
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
specifying an OBJECT IDENTIFIER value to refer to the information
module containing the invocation.
5.7. Usage Example
Consider how a skeletal MIB module might be constructed: e.g.,
FIZBIN-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, experimental
FROM SNMPv2-SMI;
fizbin MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "9505241811Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF SNMPv2 Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
" Marshall T. Rose
Postal: Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
420 Whisman Court
Mountain View, CA 94043-2186
US
Tel: +1 415 968 1052
Fax: +1 415 968 2510
E-mail: mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us"
DESCRIPTION
"The MIB module for entities implementing the xxxx
protocol."
REVISION "9505241811Z"
DESCRIPTION
"The latest version of this MIB module."
REVISION "9210070433Z"
DESCRIPTION
"The initial version of this MIB module."
-- contact IANA for actual number
::= { experimental xx }
END
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
6. Mapping of the OBJECT-IDENTITY macro
The OBJECT-IDENTITY macro is used to define information about an
OBJECT IDENTIFIER assignment. All administrative OBJECT IDENTIFIER
assignments which define a type identification value (see
AutonomousType, a textual convention defined in [3]) should be
defined via the OBJECT-IDENTITY macro. It should be noted that the
expansion of the OBJECT-IDENTITY macro is something which
conceptually happens during implementation and not during run-time.
6.1. Mapping of the STATUS clause
The STATUS clause, which must be present, indicates whether this
definition is current or historic.
The values "current", and "obsolete" are self-explanatory. The
"deprecated" value indicates that the definition is obsolete, but
that an implementor may wish to support it to foster interoperability
with older implementations.
6.2. Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause
The DESCRIPTION clause, which must be present, contains a textual
description of the object assignment.
6.3. Mapping of the REFERENCE clause
The REFERENCE clause, which need not be present, contains a textual
cross-reference to an object assignment defined in some other
information module.
6.4. Mapping of the OBJECT-IDENTITY value
The value of an invocation of the OBJECT-IDENTITY macro is an OBJECT
IDENTIFIER.
6.5. Usage Example
Consider how an OBJECT IDENTIFIER assignment might be made: e.g.,
fizbin69 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The authoritative identity of the Fizbin 69 chipset."
::= { fizbinChipSets 1 }
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
7. Mapping of the OBJECT-TYPE macro
The OBJECT-TYPE macro is used to define a type of managed object. It
should be noted that the expansion of the OBJECT-TYPE macro is
something which conceptually happens during implementation and not
during run-time.
For leaf objects which are not columnar objects (i.e., not contained
within a conceptual table), instances of the object are identified by
appending a sub-identifier of zero to the name of that object.
Otherwise, the INDEX clause of the conceptual row object superior to
a columnar object defines instance identification information.
7.1. Mapping of the SYNTAX clause
The SYNTAX clause, which must be present, defines the abstract data
structure corresponding to that object. The data structure must be
one of the following: a base type, the BITS construct, or a textual
convention. (SEQUENCE OF and SEQUENCE are also possible for
conceptual tables, see section 7.1.12). The base types are those
defined in the ObjectSyntax CHOICE. A textual convention is a
newly-defined type defined as a sub-type of a base type [3].
A extended subset of the full capabilities of ASN.1 sub-typing is
allowed, as appropriate to the underingly ASN.1 type. Any such
restriction on size, range, enumerations or repertoire specified in
this clause represents the maximal level of support which makes
"protocol sense". Restrictions on sub-typing are specified in detail
in Section 9 and Appendix C of this memo.
The semantics of ObjectSyntax are now described.
7.1.1. Integer32 and INTEGER
The Integer32 type represents integer-valued information between
-2^31 and 2^31-1 inclusive (-2147483648 to 2147483647 decimal). This
type is indistinguishable from the INTEGER type. Both the INTEGER
and Integer32 types may be sub-typed to be more constrained than the
Integer32 type.
The INTEGER type may also be used to represent integer-valued
information as named-number enumerations. In this case, only those
named-numbers so enumerated may be present as a value. Note that
although it is recommended that enumerated values start at 1 and be
numbered contiguously, any valid value for Integer32 is allowed for
an enumerated value and, further, enumerated values needn't be
contiguously assigned.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
Finally, a label for a named-number enumeration must consist of one
or more letters or digits (no hyphens), up to a maximum of 64
characters, and the initial character must be a lower-case letter.
(However, labels longer than 32 characters are not recommended.)
7.1.2. OCTET STRING
The OCTET STRING type represents arbitrary binary or textual data.
Although there is no SMI-specified size limitation for this type, MIB
designers should realize that there may be implementation and
interoperability limitations for sizes in excess of 255 octets.
7.1.3. OBJECT IDENTIFIER
The OBJECT IDENTIFIER type represents administratively assigned
names. Any instance of this type may have at most 128 sub-
identifiers. Further, each sub-identifier must not exceed the value
2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal).
7.1.4. The BITS construct
The BITS construct represents an enumeration of named bits. This
collection is assigned non-negative, contiguous values, starting at
zero. Only those named-bits so enumerated may be present in a value.
(Thus, enumerations must be assigned to consecutive bits; however,
see Section 9 for refinements of an object with this syntax.)
Although there is no SMI-specified limitation on the number of
enumerations (and therefore on the length of a value), MIB designers
should realize that there may be implementation and interoperability
limitations for sizes in excess of 128 bits.
Finally, a label for a named-number enumeration must consist of one
or more letters or digits (no hyphens), up to a maximum of 64
characters, and the initial character must be a lower-case letter.
(However, labels longer than 32 characters are not recommended.)
7.1.5. IpAddress
The IpAddress type represents a 32-bit internet address. It is
represented as an OCTET STRING of length 4, in network byte-order.
Note that the IpAddress type is a tagged type for historical reasons.
Network addresses should be represented using an invocation of the
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION macro [3].
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
7.1.6. Counter32
The Counter32 type represents a non-negative integer which
monotonically increases until it reaches a maximum value of 2^32-1
(4294967295 decimal), when it wraps around and starts increasing
again from zero.
Counters have no defined "initial" value, and thus, a single value of
a Counter has (in general) no information content. Discontinuities
in the monotonically increasing value normally occur at re-
initialization of the management system, and at other times as
specified in the description of an object-type using this ASN.1 type.
If such other times can occur, for example, the creation of an object
instance at times other than re-initialization, then a corresponding
object should be defined with a SYNTAX clause value of TimeStamp (a
textual convention defined in [3]) indicating the time of the last
discontinuity.
The value of the MAX-ACCESS clause for objects with a SYNTAX clause
value of Counter32 is either "read-only" or "accessible-for-notify".
A DEFVAL clause is not allowed for objects with a SYNTAX clause value
of Counter32.
7.1.7. Gauge32
The Gauge32 type represents a non-negative integer, which may
increase or decrease, but shall never exceed a maximum value. The
maximum value can not be greater than 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal).
The value of a Gauge has its maximum value whenever the information
being modeled is greater or equal to that maximum value; if the
information being modeled subsequently decreases below the maximum
value, the Gauge also decreases.
7.1.8. TimeTicks
The TimeTicks type represents a non-negative integer which represents
the time, modulo 2^32 (4294967296 decimal), in hundredths of a second
between two epochs. When objects are defined which use this ASN.1
type, the description of the object identifies both of the reference
epochs.
For example, [3] defines the TimeStamp textual convention which is
based on the TimeTicks type. With a TimeStamp, the first reference
epoch is defined as the time when sysUpTime [5] was zero, and the
second reference epoch is defined as the current value of sysUpTime.
The TimeTicks type may not be sub-typed.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
7.1.9. Opaque
The Opaque type is provided solely for backward-compatibility, and
shall not be used for newly-defined object types.
The Opaque type supports the capability to pass arbitrary ASN.1
syntax. A value is encoded using the ASN.1 Basic Encoding Rules [4]
into a string of octets. This, in turn, is encoded as an OCTET
STRING, in effect "double-wrapping" the original ASN.1 value.
Note that a conforming implementation need only be able to accept and
recognize opaquely-encoded data. It need not be able to unwrap the
data and then interpret its contents.
A requirement on "standard" MIB modules is that no object may have a
SYNTAX clause value of Opaque.
7.1.10. Counter64
The Counter64 type represents a non-negative integer which
monotonically increases until it reaches a maximum value of 2^64-1
(18446744073709551615 decimal), when it wraps around and starts
increasing again from zero.
Counters have no defined "initial" value, and thus, a single value of
a Counter has (in general) no information content. Discontinuities
in the monotonically increasing value normally occur at re-
initialization of the management system, and at other times as
specified in the description of an object-type using this ASN.1 type.
If such other times can occur, for example, the creation of an object
instance at times other than re-initialization, then a corresponding
object should be defined with a SYNTAX clause value of TimeStamp (a
textual convention defined in [3]) indicating the time of the last
discontinuity.
The value of the MAX-ACCESS clause for objects with a SYNTAX clause
value of Counter64 is either "read-only" or "accessible-for-notify".
A requirement on "standard" MIB modules is that the Counter64 type
may be used only if the information being modeled would wrap in less
than one hour if the Counter32 type was used instead.
A DEFVAL clause is not allowed for objects with a SYNTAX clause value
of Counter64.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
7.1.11. Unsigned32
The Unsigned32 type represents integer-valued information between 0
and 2^32-1 inclusive (0 to 4294967295 decimal).
7.1.12. Conceptual Tables
Management operations apply exclusively to scalar objects. However,
it is sometimes convenient for developers of management applications
to impose an imaginary, tabular structure on an ordered collection of
objects within the MIB. Each such conceptual table contains zero or
more rows, and each row may contain one or more scalar objects,
termed columnar objects. This conceptualization is formalized by
using the OBJECT-TYPE macro to define both an object which
corresponds to a table and an object which corresponds to a row in
that table. A conceptual table has SYNTAX of the form:
SEQUENCE OF <EntryType>
where <EntryType> refers to the SEQUENCE type of its subordinate
conceptual row. A conceptual row has SYNTAX of the form:
<EntryType>
where <EntryType> is a SEQUENCE type defined as follows:
<EntryType> ::= SEQUENCE { <type1>, ... , <typeN> }
where there is one <type> for each subordinate object, and each
<type> is of the form:
<descriptor> <syntax>
where <descriptor> is the descriptor naming a subordinate object, and
<syntax> has the value of that subordinate object's SYNTAX clause,
normally omitting the sub-typing information. Further, these ASN.1
types are always present (the DEFAULT and OPTIONAL clauses are
disallowed in the SEQUENCE definition). The MAX-ACCESS clause for
conceptual tables and rows is "not-accessible".
7.1.12.1. Creation and Deletion of Conceptual Rows
For newly-defined conceptual rows which allow the creation of new
object instances and/or the deletion of existing object instances,
there should be one columnar object with a SYNTAX clause value of
RowStatus (a textual convention defined in [3]) and a MAX-ACCESS
clause value of read-create. By convention, this is termed the
status column for the conceptual row.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
7.2. Mapping of the UNITS clause
This UNITS clause, which need not be present, contains a textual
definition of the units associated with that object.
7.3. Mapping of the MAX-ACCESS clause
The MAX-ACCESS clause, which must be present, defines whether it
makes "protocol sense" to read, write and/or create an instance of
the object, or to include its value in a notification. This is the
maximal level of access for the object. (This maximal level of
access is independent of any administrative authorization policy.)
The value "read-write" indicates that read and write access make
"protocol sense", but create does not. The value "read-create"
indicates that read, write and create access make "protocol sense".
The value "not-accessible" indicates an auxiliary object (see Section
7.7). The value "accessible-for-notify" indicates an object which is
accessible only via a notification (e.g., snmpTrapOID [5]).
These values are ordered, from least to greatest: "not-accessible",
"accessible-for-notify", "read-only", "read-write", "read-create".
If any columnar object in a conceptual row has "read-create" as its
maximal level of access, then no other columnar object of the same
conceptual row may have a maximal access of "read-write". (Note that
"read-create" is a superset of "read-write".)
7.4. Mapping of the STATUS clause
The STATUS clause, which must be present, indicates whether this
definition is current or historic.
The values "current", and "obsolete" are self-explanatory. The
"deprecated" value indicates that the definition is obsolete, but
that an implementor may wish to support that object to foster
interoperability with older implementations.
7.5. Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause
The DESCRIPTION clause, which must be present, contains a textual
definition of that object which provides all semantic definitions
necessary for implementation, and should embody any information which
would otherwise be communicated in any ASN.1 commentary annotations
associated with the object.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
7.6. Mapping of the REFERENCE clause
The REFERENCE clause, which need not be present, contains a textual
cross-reference to an object defined in some other information
module. This is useful when de-osifying a MIB module produced by
some other organization.
7.7. Mapping of the INDEX clause
The INDEX clause, which must be present if that object corresponds to
a conceptual row (unless an AUGMENTS clause is present instead), and
must be absent otherwise, defines instance identification information
for the columnar objects subordinate to that object.
The instance identification information in an INDEX clause must
specify object(s) such that value(s) of those object(s) will
unambiguously distinguish a conceptual row. The syntax of those
objects indicate how to form the instance-identifier:
(1) integer-valued: a single sub-identifier taking the integer value
(this works only for non-negative integers);
(2) string-valued, fixed-length strings (or variable-length preceded by
the IMPLIED keyword): `n' sub-identifiers, where `n' is the length
of the string (each octet of the string is encoded in a separate
sub-identifier);
(3) string-valued, variable-length strings (not preceded by the IMPLIED
keyword): `n+1' sub-identifiers, where `n' is the length of the
string (the first sub-identifier is `n' itself, following this,
each octet of the string is encoded in a separate sub-identifier);
(4) object identifier-valued (when preceded by the IMPLIED keyword):
`n' sub-identifiers, where `n' is the number of sub-identifiers in
the value (each sub-identifier of the value is copied into a
separate sub-identifier);
(5) object identifier-valued (when not preceded by the IMPLIED
keyword): `n+1' sub-identifiers, where `n' is the number of sub-
identifiers in the value (the first sub-identifier is `n' itself,
following this, each sub-identifier in the value is copied);
(6) IpAddress-valued: 4 sub-identifiers, in the familiar a.b.c.d
notation.
Note that the IMPLIED keyword can only be present for an object
having a variable-length syntax (e.g., variable-length strings or
object identifier-valued objects), Further, the IMPLIED keyword can
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
only be associated with the last object in the INDEX clause.
Finally, the IMPLIED keyword may not be used on a variable-length
string object if that string might have a value of zero-length.
Instances identified by use of integer-valued objects should be
numbered starting from one (i.e., not from zero). The use of zero as
a value for an integer-valued index object should be avoided, except
in special cases.
Objects which are both specified in the INDEX clause of a conceptual
row and also columnar objects of the same conceptual row are termed
auxiliary objects. The MAX-ACCESS clause for auxiliary objects is
"not-accessible", except in the following circumstances:
(1) within a MIB module originally written to conform to the SNMPv1
framework, and later converted to conform to the SNMPv2 framework;
or
(2) a conceptual row must contain at least one columnar object which is
not an auxiliary object. In the event that all of a conceptual
row's columnar objects are also specified in its INDEX clause, then
one of them must be accessible, i.e., have a MAX-ACCESS clause of
"read-only". (Note that this situation does not arise for a
conceptual row allowing create access, since such a row will have a
status column which will not be an auxiliary object.)
Note that objects specified in a conceptual row's INDEX clause need
not be columnar objects of that conceptual row. In this situation,
the DESCRIPTION clause of the conceptual row must include a textual
explanation of how the objects which are included in the INDEX clause
but not columnar objects of that conceptual row, are used in uniquely
identifying instances of the conceptual row's columnar objects.
7.8. Mapping of the AUGMENTS clause
The AUGMENTS clause, which must not be present unless the object
corresponds to a conceptual row, is an alternative to the INDEX
clause. Every object corresponding to a conceptual row has either an
INDEX clause or an AUGMENTS clause.
If an object corresponding to a conceptual row has an INDEX clause,
that row is termed a base conceptual row; alternatively, if the
object has an AUGMENTS clause, the row is said to be a conceptual row
augmentation, where the AUGMENTS clause names the object
corresponding to the base conceptual row which is augmented by this
conceptual row augmentation. (Thus, a conceptual row augmentation
cannot itself be augmented.) Instances of subordinate columnar
objects of a conceptual row augmentation are identified according to
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
the INDEX clause of the base conceptual row corresponding to the
object named in the AUGMENTS clause. Further, instances of
subordinate columnar objects of a conceptual row augmentation exist
according to the same semantics as instances of subordinate columnar
objects of the base conceptual row being augmented. As such, note
that creation of a base conceptual row implies the correspondent
creation of any conceptual row augmentations.
For example, a MIB designer might wish to define additional columns
in an "enterprise-specific" MIB which logically extend a conceptual
row in a "standard" MIB. The "standard" MIB definition of the
conceptual row would include the INDEX clause and the "enterprise-
specific" MIB would contain the definition of a conceptual row using
the AUGMENTS clause. On the other hand, it would be incorrect to use
the AUGMENTS clause for the relationship between RFC 1573's ifTable
and the many media-specific MIBs which extend it for specific media
(e.g., the dot3Table in RFC 1650), since not all interfaces are of
the same media.
Note that a base conceptual row may be augmented by multiple
conceptual row augmentations.
7.8.1. Relation between INDEX and AUGMENTS clauses
When defining instance identification information for a conceptual
table:
(1) If there is a one-to-one correspondence between the conceptual rows
of this table and an existing table, then the AUGMENTS clause
should be used.
(2) Otherwise, if there is a sparse relationship between the conceptual
rows of this table and an existing table, then an INDEX clause
should be used which is identical to that in the existing table.
For example, the relationship between RFC 1573's ifTable and a
media-specific MIB which extends the ifTable for a specific media
(e.g., the dot3Table in RFC 1650), is a sparse relationship.
(3) Otherwise, if no existing objects have the required syntax and
semantics, then auxiliary objects should be defined within the
conceptual row for the new table, and those objects should be used
within the INDEX clause for the conceptual row.
7.9. Mapping of the DEFVAL clause
The DEFVAL clause, which need not be present, defines an acceptable
default value which may be used at the discretion of a SNMPv2 entity
acting in an agent role when an object instance is created.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
During conceptual row creation, if an instance of a columnar object
is not present as one of the operands in the correspondent management
protocol set operation, then the value of the DEFVAL clause, if
present, indicates an acceptable default value that a SNMPv2 entity
acting in an agent role might use.
The value of the DEFVAL clause must, of course, correspond to the
SYNTAX clause for the object. If the value is an OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
then it must be expressed as a single ASN.1 identifier, and not as a
collection of sub-identifiers.
Note that if an operand to the management protocol set operation is
an instance of a read-only object, then the error `notWritable' [6]
will be returned. As such, the DEFVAL clause can be used to provide
an acceptable default value that a SNMPv2 entity acting in an agent
role might use.
By way of example, consider the following possible DEFVAL clauses:
ObjectSyntax DEFVAL clause
---------------- ------------
Integer32 DEFVAL { 1 }
-- same for Gauge32, TimeTicks, Unsigned32
INTEGER DEFVAL { valid } -- enumerated value
OCTET STRING DEFVAL { 'ffffffffffff'H }
OBJECT IDENTIFIER DEFVAL { sysDescr }
BITS DEFVAL { { primary, secondary } }
-- enumerated values that are set
IpAddress DEFVAL { 'c0210415'H } -- 192.33.4.21
Object types with SYNTAX of Counter32 and Counter64 may not have
DEFVAL clauses, since they do not have defined initial values.
However, it is recommended that they be initialized to zero.
7.10. Mapping of the OBJECT-TYPE value
The value of an invocation of the OBJECT-TYPE macro is the name of
the object, which is an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively
assigned name.
When an OBJECT IDENTIFIER is assigned to an object:
(1) If the object corresponds to a conceptual table, then only a single
assignment, that for a conceptual row, is present immediately
beneath that object. The administratively assigned name for the
conceptual row object is derived by appending a sub-identifier of
"1" to the administratively assigned name for the conceptual table.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
(2) If the object corresponds to a conceptual row, then at least one
assignment, one for each column in the conceptual row, is present
beneath that object. The administratively assigned name for each
column is derived by appending a unique, positive sub-identifier to
the administratively assigned name for the conceptual row.
(3) Otherwise, no other OBJECT IDENTIFIERs which are subordinate to the
object may be assigned.
Note that the final sub-identifier of any administratively assigned
name for an object shall be positive. A zero-valued final sub-
identifier is reserved for future use.
Further note that although conceptual tables and rows are given
administratively assigned names, these conceptual objects may not be
manipulated in aggregate form by the management protocol.
7.11. Usage Example
Consider how one might define a conceptual table and its
subordinates. (This example uses the RowStatus textual convention
defined in [3].)
evalSlot OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The index number of the first unassigned entry in the
evaluation table.
A management station should create new entries in the
evaluation table using this algorithm: first, issue a
management protocol retrieval operation to determine the
value of evalSlot; and, second, issue a management protocol
set operation to create an instance of the evalStatus object
setting its value to createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5). If
this latter operation succeeds, then the management station
may continue modifying the instances corresponding to the
newly created conceptual row, without fear of collision with
other management stations."
::= { eval 1 }
evalTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EvalEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
"The (conceptual) evaluation table."
::= { eval 2 }
evalEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EvalEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry (conceptual row) in the evaluation table."
INDEX { evalIndex }
::= { evalTable 1 }
EvalEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
evalIndex Integer32,
evalString DisplayString,
evalValue Integer32,
evalStatus RowStatus
}
evalIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The auxiliary variable used for identifying instances of
the columnar objects in the evaluation table."
::= { evalEntry 1 }
evalString OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DisplayString
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The string to evaluate."
::= { evalEntry 2 }
evalValue OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value when evalString was last executed."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { evalEntry 3 }
evalStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status column used for creating, modifying, and
deleting instances of the columnar objects in the evaluation
table."
DEFVAL { active }
::= { evalEntry 4 }
8. Mapping of the NOTIFICATION-TYPE macro
The NOTIFICATION-TYPE macro is used to define the information
contained within an unsolicited transmission of management
information (i.e., within either a SNMPv2-Trap-PDU or InformRequest-
PDU). It should be noted that the expansion of the NOTIFICATION-TYPE
macro is something which conceptually happens during implementation
and not during run-time.
8.1. Mapping of the OBJECTS clause
The OBJECTS clause, which need not be present, defines the ordered
sequence of MIB object types which are contained within every
instance of the notification. An object type specified in this
clause may not have an MAX-ACCESS clause of "not-accessible".
8.2. Mapping of the STATUS clause
The STATUS clause, which must be present, indicates whether this
definition is current or historic.
The values "current", and "obsolete" are self-explanatory. The
"deprecated" value indicates that the definition is obsolete, but
that an implementor may wish to support the notification to foster
interoperability with older implementations.
8.3. Mapping of the DESCRIPTION clause
The DESCRIPTION clause, which must be present, contains a textual
definition of the notification which provides all semantic
definitions necessary for implementation, and should embody any
information which would otherwise be communicated in any ASN.1
commentary annotations associated with the notification. In
particular, the DESCRIPTION clause should document which instances of
the objects mentioned in the OBJECTS clause should be contained
within notifications of this type.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
8.4. Mapping of the REFERENCE clause
The REFERENCE clause, which need not be present, contains a textual
cross-reference to a notification defined in some other information
module. This is useful when de-osifying a MIB module produced by
some other organization.
8.5. Mapping of the NOTIFICATION-TYPE value
The value of an invocation of the NOTIFICATION-TYPE macro is the name
of the notification, which is an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an
administratively assigned name. In order to achieve compatibility
with the procedures employed by proxy agents (see Section 3.1.2 of
[7]), the next to last sub-identifier in the name of any newly-
defined notification must have the value zero.
Sections 4.2.6 and 4.2.7 of [6] describe how the NOTIFICATION-TYPE
macro is used to generate a SNMPv2-Trap-PDU or InformRequest-PDU,
respectively.
8.6. Usage Example
Consider how a linkUp trap might be described:
linkUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { ifIndex }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A linkUp trap signifies that the SNMPv2 entity, acting in
an agent role, recognizes that one of the communication
links represented in its configuration has come up."
::= { snmpTraps 4 }
According to this invocation, the trap authoritatively identified as
{ snmpTraps 4 }
is used to report a link coming up.
9. Refined Syntax
Some macros have clauses which allows syntax to be refined,
specifically: the SYNTAX clause of the OBJECT-TYPE macro, and the
SYNTAX/WRITE-SYNTAX clauses of the MODULE-COMPLIANCE and AGENT-
CAPABILITIES macros [2]. However, not all refinements of syntax are
appropriate. In particular, the object's primitive or application
type must not be changed.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
Further, the following restrictions apply:
Restrictions to Refinement on
object syntax range enumeration size repertoire
----------------- ----- ----------- ---- ----------
INTEGER (1) (2) - -
Integer32 (1) - - -
Unsigned32 (1) - - -
OCTET STRING - - (3) (4)
OBJECT IDENTIFIER - - - -
BITS - (2) - -
IpAddress - - - -
Counter32 - - - -
Counter64 - - - -
Gauge32 (1) - - -
TimeTicks - - - -
where:
(1) the range of permitted values may be refined by raising the lower-
bounds, by reducing the upper-bounds, and/or by reducing the
alternative value/range choices;
(2) the enumeration of named-values may be refined by removing one or
more named-values (note that for BITS, a refinement may cause the
enumerations to no longer be contiguous);
(3) the size in characters of the value may be refined by raising the
lower-bounds, by reducing the upper-bounds, and/or by reducing the
alternative size choices; or,
(4) the repertoire of characters in the value may be reduced by further
sub-typing.
Otherwise no refinements are possible. Further details on sub-typing
are provided in Appendix C.
10. Extending an Information Module
As experience is gained with a published information module, it may
be desirable to revise that information module.
To begin, the invocation of the MODULE-IDENTITY macro should be
updated to include information about the revision. Usually, this
consists of updating the LAST-UPDATED clause and adding a pair of
REVISION and DESCRIPTION clauses. However, other existing clauses in
the invocation may be updated.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
Note that the module's label (e.g., "FIZBIN-MIB" from the example in
Section 5.8), is not changed when the information module is revised.
10.1. Object Assignments
If any non-editorial change is made to any clause of a object
assignment, then the OBJECT IDENTIFIER value associated with that
object assignment must also be changed, along with its associated
descriptor.
10.2. Object Definitions
An object definition may be revised in any of the following ways:
(1) A SYNTAX clause containing an enumerated INTEGER may have new
enumerations added or existing labels changed.
(2) A STATUS clause value of "current" may be revised as "deprecated"
or "obsolete". Similarly, a STATUS clause value of "deprecated"
may be revised as "obsolete".
(3) A DEFVAL clause may be added or updated.
(4) A REFERENCE clause may be added or updated.
(5) A UNITS clause may be added.
(6) A conceptual row may be augmented by adding new columnar objects at
the end of the row.
(7) Entirely new objects may be defined, named with previously
unassigned OBJECT IDENTIFIER values.
Otherwise, if the semantics of any previously defined object are
changed (i.e., if a non-editorial change is made to any clause other
those specifically allowed above), then the OBJECT IDENTIFIER value
associated with that object must also be changed.
Note that changing the descriptor associated with an existing object
is considered a semantic change, as these strings may be used in an
IMPORTS statement.
Finally, note that if an object has the value of its STATUS clause
changed, then the value of its DESCRIPTION clause should be updated
accordingly.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
10.3. Notification Definitions
A notification definition may be revised in any of the following
ways:
(1) A REFERENCE clause may be added or updated.
Otherwise, if the semantics of any previously defined notification
are changed (i.e., if a non-editorial change is made to any clause
other those specifically allowed above), then the OBJECT IDENTIFIER
value associated with that notification must also be changed.
Note that changing the descriptor associated with an existing
notification is considered a semantic change, as these strings may be
used in an IMPORTS statement.
Finally, note that if an object has the value of its STATUS clause
changed, then the value of its DESCRIPTION clause should be updated
accordingly.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
11. Appendix A: de-OSIfying a MIB module
There has been an increasing amount of work recently on taking MIBs
defined by other organizations (e.g., the IEEE) and de-osifying them
for use with the Internet-standard network management framework. The
steps to achieve this are straight-forward, though tedious. Of
course, it is helpful to already be experienced in writing MIB
modules for use with the Internet-standard network management
framework.
The first step is to construct a skeletal MIB module, as shown
earlier in Section 5.8. The next step is to categorize the objects
into groups. Optional objects are not permitted. Thus, when a MIB
module is created, optional objects must be placed in a additional
groups, which, if implemented, all objects in the group must be
implemented. For the first pass, it is wisest to simply ignore any
optional objects in the original MIB: experience shows it is better
to define a core MIB module first, containing only essential objects;
later, if experience demands, other objects can be added.
11.1. Managed Object Mapping
Next for each managed object class, determine whether there can exist
multiple instances of that managed object class. If not, then for
each of its attributes, use the OBJECT-TYPE macro to make an
equivalent definition.
Otherwise, if multiple instances of the managed object class can
exist, then define a conceptual table having conceptual rows each
containing a columnar object for each of the managed object class's
attributes. If the managed object class is contained within the
containment tree of another managed object class, then the assignment
of an object is normally required for each of the "distinguished
attributes" of the containing managed object class. If they do not
already exist within the MIB module, then they can be added via the
definition of additional columnar objects in the conceptual row
corresponding to the contained managed object class.
In defining a conceptual row, it is useful to consider the
optimization of network management operations which will act upon its
columnar objects. In particular, it is wisest to avoid defining more
columnar objects within a conceptual row, than can fit in a single
PDU. As a rule of thumb, a conceptual row should contain no more
than approximately 20 objects. Similarly, or as a way to abide by
the "20 object guideline", columnar objects should be grouped into
tables according to the expected grouping of network management
operations upon them. As such, the content of conceptual rows should
reflect typical access scenarios, e.g., they should be organized
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
along functional lines such as one row for statistics and another row
for parameters, or along usage lines such as commonly-needed objects
versus rarely-needed objects.
On the other hand, the definition of conceptual rows where the number
of columnar objects used as indexes outnumbers the number used to
hold information, should also be avoided. In particular, the
splitting of a managed object class's attributes into many conceptual
tables should not be used as a way to obtain the same degree of
flexibility/complexity as is often found in MIBs with a myriad of
optionals.
11.1.1. Mapping to the SYNTAX clause
When mapping to the SYNTAX clause of the OBJECT-TYPE macro:
(1) An object with BOOLEAN syntax becomes a TruthValue [3].
(2) An object with INTEGER syntax becomes an Integer32.
(3) An object with ENUMERATED syntax becomes an INTEGER with
enumerations, taking any of the values given which can be
represented with an Integer32.
(4) An object with BIT STRING syntax having enumerations becomes a BITS
construct.
(5) An object with BIT STRING syntax but no enumerations becomes an
OCTET STRING.
(6) An object with a character string syntax becomes either an OCTET
STRING, or a DisplayString [3], depending on the repertoire of the
character string.
(7) A non-tabular object with a complex syntax, such as REAL or
EXTERNAL, must be decomposed, usually into an OCTET STRING (if
sensible). As a rule, any object with a complicated syntax should
be avoided.
(8) Tabular objects must be decomposed into rows of columnar objects.
11.1.2. Mapping to the UNITS clause
If the description of this managed object defines a unit-basis, then
mapping to this clause is straight-forward.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
11.1.3. Mapping to the MAX-ACCESS clause
This is straight-forward.
11.1.4. Mapping to the STATUS clause
This is straight-forward.
11.1.5. Mapping to the DESCRIPTION clause
This is straight-forward: simply copy the text, making sure that any
embedded double quotation marks are sanitized (i.e., replaced with
single-quotes or removed).
11.1.6. Mapping to the REFERENCE clause
This is straight-forward: simply include a textual reference to the
object being mapped, the document which defines the object, and
perhaps a page number in the document.
11.1.7. Mapping to the INDEX clause
If necessary, decide how instance-identifiers for columnar objects
are to be formed and define this clause accordingly.
11.1.8. Mapping to the DEFVAL clause
Decide if a meaningful default value can be assigned to the object
being mapped, and if so, define the DEFVAL clause accordingly.
11.2. Action Mapping
Actions are modeled as read-write objects, in which writing a
particular value results in a state change. (Usually, as a part of
this state change, some action might take place.)
11.2.1. Mapping to the SYNTAX clause
Usually the Integer32 syntax is used with a distinguished value
provided for each action that the object provides access to. In
addition, there is usually one other distinguished value, which is
the one returned when the object is read.
11.2.2. Mapping to the MAX-ACCESS clause
Always use read-write or read-create.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
11.2.3. Mapping to the STATUS clause
This is straight-forward.
11.2.4. Mapping to the DESCRIPTION clause
This is straight-forward: simply copy the text, making sure that any
embedded double quotation marks are sanitized (i.e., replaced with
single-quotes or removed).
11.2.5. Mapping to the REFERENCE clause
This is straight-forward: simply include a textual reference to the
action being mapped, the document which defines the action, and
perhaps a page number in the document.
11.3. Event Mapping
Events are modeled as SNMPv2 notifications using NOTIFICATION-TYPE
macro. However, recall that SNMPv2 emphasizes trap-directed polling.
As such, few, and usually no, notifications, need be defined for any
MIB module.
11.3.1. Mapping to the STATUS clause
This is straight-forward.
11.3.2. Mapping to the DESCRIPTION clause
This is straight-forward: simply copy the text, making sure that any
embedded double quotation marks are sanitized (i.e., replaced with
single-quotes or removed).
11.3.3. Mapping to the REFERENCE clause
This is straight-forward: simply include a textual reference to the
notification being mapped, the document which defines the
notification, and perhaps a page number in the document.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
12. Appendix B: UTC Time Format
Several clauses defined in this document use the UTC Time format:
YYMMDDHHMMZ
where: YY - last two digits of year
MM - month (01 through 12)
DD - day of month (01 through 31)
HH - hours (00 through 23)
MM - minutes (00 through 59)
Z - the character "Z" denotes Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).
For example, "9502192015Z" represents 8:15pm GMT on 19 February 1995.
13. Appendix C: Detailed Sub-typing Rules
13.1. Syntax Rules
The syntax rules for sub-typing are given below. Note that while
this syntax is based on ASN.1, it includes some extensions beyond
what is allowed in ASN.1, and a number of ASN.1 constructs are not
allowed by this syntax.
<integerSubType>
::= <empty>
| "(" <range> ["|" <range>]... ")"
<octetStringSubType>
::= <empty>
| "(" "SIZE" "(" <range> ["|" <range>]... ")" ")"
<range>
::= <value>
| <value> ".." <value>
<value>
::= "-" <number>
| <number>
| <hexString>
| <binString>
where:
<empty> is the empty string
<number> is a non-negative integer
<hexString> is a hexadecimal string (i.e. 'xxxx'H)
<binString> is a binary string (i.e. 'xxxx'B)
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
<range> is further restricted as follows:
- any <value> used in a SIZE clause must be non-negative.
- when a pair of values is specified, the first value
must be less than the second value.
- when multiple ranges are specified, the ranges may
not overlap but may touch. For example, (1..4 | 4..9)
is invalid, and (1..4 | 5..9) is valid.
- the ranges must be a subset of the maximum range of the
base type.
13.2. Examples
Some examples of legal sub-typing:
Integer32 (-20..100)
Integer32 (0..100 | 300..500)
Integer32 (300..500 | 0..100)
Integer32 (0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10)
OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..100))
OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..100 | 300..500))
OCTET STRING (SIZE(0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10))
Some examples of illegal sub-typing:
Integer32 (150..100) -- first greater than second
Integer32 (0..100 | 50..500) -- ranges overlap
Integer32 (0 | 2 | 0 ) -- value duplicated
Integer32 (MIN..-1 | 1..MAX) -- MIN and MAX not allowed
Integer32 ((SIZE (0..34)) -- must not use SIZE
OCTET STRING (0..100) -- must use SIZE
OCTET STRING (SIZE(-10..100)) -- negative SIZE
13.3. Rules for Textual Conventions
Sub-typing of Textual Conventions (see [3]) is allowed but must be
valid. In particular, each range specified for the textual
convention must be a subset of a range specified for the base type.
For example,
Tc1 ::= INTEGER (1..10 | 11..20)
Tc2 ::= Tc1 (2..10 | 12..15) -- is valid
Tc3 ::= Tc1 (4..8) -- is valid
Tc4 ::= Tc1 (8..12) -- is invalid
14. Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
15. Editor's Address
Keith McCloghrie
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134-1706
US
Phone: +1 408 526 5260
EMail: kzm@cisco.com
16. Acknowledgements
This document is the result of significant work by the four major
contributors:
Jeffrey D. Case (SNMP Research, case@snmp.com)
Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems, kzm@cisco.com)
Marshall T. Rose (Dover Beach Consulting, mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us)
Steven Waldbusser (International Network Services, stevew@uni.ins.com)
In addition, the contributions of the SNMPv2 Working Group are
acknowledged. In particular, a special thanks is extended for the
contributions of:
Alexander I. Alten (Novell)
Dave Arneson (Cabletron)
Uri Blumenthal (IBM)
Doug Book (Chipcom)
Kim Curran (Bell-Northern Research)
Jim Galvin (Trusted Information Systems)
Maria Greene (Ascom Timeplex)
Iain Hanson (Digital)
Dave Harrington (Cabletron)
Nguyen Hien (IBM)
Jeff Johnson (Cisco Systems)
Michael Kornegay (Object Quest)
Deirdre Kostick (AT&T Bell Labs)
David Levi (SNMP Research)
Daniel Mahoney (Cabletron)
Bob Natale (ACE*COMM)
Brian O'Keefe (Hewlett Packard)
Andrew Pearson (SNMP Research)
Dave Perkins (Peer Networks)
Randy Presuhn (Peer Networks)
Aleksey Romanov (Quality Quorum)
Shawn Routhier (Epilogue)
Jon Saperia (BGS Systems)
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 1902 SMI for SNMPv2 January 1996
Bob Stewart (Cisco Systems, bstewart@cisco.com), chair
Kaj Tesink (Bellcore)
Glenn Waters (Bell-Northern Research)
Bert Wijnen (IBM)
17. References
[1] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -
Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1),
International Organization for Standardization. International
Standard 8824, (December, 1987).
[2] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1904, January 1996.
[3] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1903, January 1996.
[4] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Syntax Notation
One (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization.
International Standard 8825, (December, 1987).
[5] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
S. Waldbusser, "Management Information Base for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1907,
January 1996.
[6] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.
[7] SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
S. Waldbusser, "Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the
Internet-standard Network Management Framework", RFC 1908,
January 1996.
SNMPv2 Working Group Standards Track [Page 40]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/
