[Docs] [txt|pdf] [draft-holbrook-...] [Tracker] [Diff1] [Diff2]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group H. Holbrook
Request for Comments: 4604 Arastra, Inc.
Updates: 3376, 3810 B. Cain
Category: Standards Track Acopia Networks
B. Haberman
JHU APL
August 2006
Using Internet Group Management Protocol Version 3 (IGMPv3)
and Multicast Listener Discovery Protocol Version 2 (MLDv2)
for Source-Specific Multicast
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
The Internet Group Management Protocol Version 3 (IGMPv3) and the
Multicast Listener Discovery Protocol Version 2 (MLDv2) are protocols
that allow a host to inform its neighboring routers of its desire to
receive IPv4 and IPv6 multicast transmissions, respectively.
Source-specific multicast (SSM) is a form of multicast in which a
receiver is required to specify both the network-layer address of the
source and the multicast destination address in order to receive the
multicast transmission. This document defines the notion of an
"SSM-aware" router and host, and clarifies and (in some cases)
modifies the behavior of IGMPv3 and MLDv2 on SSM-aware routers and
hosts to accommodate source-specific multicast. This document
updates the IGMPv3 and MLDv2 specifications.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
1. Introduction
The Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) [RFC1112, IGMPv2,
IGMPv3] allows an IPv4 host to communicate IP multicast group
membership information to its neighboring routers. IGMP version 3
(IGMPv3) [IGMPv3] provides the ability for a host to selectively
request or filter traffic from individual sources within a multicast
group.
The Multicast Listener Discovery Protocol (MLD) [RFC2710, MLDv2]
offers similar functionality for IPv6 hosts. MLD version 2 (MLDv2)
provides the analogous "source filtering" functionality of IGMPv3 for
IPv6.
Due to the commonality of function, the term "Group Management
Protocol", or "GMP", will be used to refer to both IGMP and MLD. The
term "Source Filtering GMP", or "SFGMP", will be used to refer
jointly to the IGMPv3 and MLDv2 group management protocols.
The use of source-specific multicast is facilitated by small changes
to the SFGMP protocols on both hosts and routers. [SSM] defines
general requirements that must be followed by systems that implement
the SSM service model; this document defines the concrete application
of those requirements to systems that implement IGMPv3 and MLDv2. In
doing so, this document defines modifications to the host and router
portions of IGMPv3 and MLDv2 for use with SSM, and presents a number
of clarifications to their behavior when used with SSM addresses.
This document updates the IGMPv3 and MLDv2 specifications.
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
In order to emphasize the parts of this document that modify the
existing protocol specifications ([RFC2710, MLDv2, IGMPv3]), as
opposed to merely clarify them, any protocol modifications are marked
with the tag "MODIFICATION".
2. Host Requirements for Source-Specific Multicast
This section defines the notion of an "SSM-aware" host and then goes
on to describe the API requirements and the SFGMP protocol
requirements of an SSM-aware host. It is important to note that SSM
can be used by any host that supports source filtering APIs and whose
operating system supports the appropriate SFGMP. The SFGMP
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
modifications described in this section make SSM work better on an
SSM-aware host, but they are not strict prerequisites for the use of
SSM.
The 232/8 IPv4 address range is currently allocated for SSM by IANA
[IANA-ALLOCATION]. In IPv6, the FF3x::/32 range (where 'x' is a
valid IPv6 multicast scope value) is reserved for SSM semantics
[RFC3306], although today SSM allocations are restricted to
FF3x::/96. ([SSM] has a more thorough discussion of this topic.) A
host that knows the SSM address range and is capable of applying SSM
semantics to it is described as an "SSM-aware" host.
A host or router may be configured to apply SSM semantics to
addresses other than those in the IANA-allocated range. The GMP
module on a host or router SHOULD have a configuration option to set
the SSM address range(s). If this configuration option exists, it
MUST default to the IANA-allocated SSM range. The mechanism for
setting this configuration option MUST at least allow for manual
configuration. Protocol mechanisms to set this option may be defined
in the future.
2.1. API Requirements
If the host IP module of an SSM-aware host receives a non-source-
specific request to receive multicast traffic sent to an SSM
destination address, it SHOULD return an error to the application, as
specified in [MSFAPI] (MODIFICATION). On a non-SSM-aware host, an
application that uses the wrong API (e.g., "join(G)",
"IPMulticastListen(G,EXCLUDE(S1))" for IGMPv3, or
"IPv6MulticastListen(G,EXCLUDE(S2))" for MLDv2) to request delivery
of packets sent to an SSM address will not receive the requested
service, because an SSM-aware router (following the rules of this
document) will refuse to process the request, and the application
will receive no indication other than a failure to receive the
requested traffic.
2.2. GMP Requirements
This section defines the behavior of the SFGMP protocol module on an
SSM-aware host, including two modifications to the protocols as
described in [IGMPv3, MLDv2]. It also includes a number of
clarifications of protocol operations. In doing so, it documents the
behavior of an SSM-aware host with respect to sending and receiving
the following GMP message types:
- IGMPv1/v2 and MLDv1 Reports (2.2.1)
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Reports (2.2.2)
- IGMPv1 Queries, IGMPv2 and MLDv1 General Queries (2.2.3)
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
- IGMPv2 Leave and MLDv1 Done (2.2.4)
- IGMPv2 and MLDv1 Group Specific Query (2.2.5)
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group Specific Query (2.2.6)
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-and-Source Specific Query (2.2.7)
2.2.1. IGMPv1/v2 and MLDv1 Reports
An SSM-aware host operating according to [IGMPv3, MLDv2] could send
an IGMPv1, IGMPv2, or MLDv1 report for an SSM address when it is
operating in "older-version compatibility mode." This is an
exceptional (error) condition, indicating that the router(s) cannot
provide the SFGMP support needed for SSM, and an error is logged when
the host enters compatibility mode for an SSM address, as described
below. In this situation, it is likely that traffic sent to a
channel (S,G) will not be delivered to a receiving host that has
requested to receive channel (S,G).
[IGMPv3] and [MLDv2] specify that a host MAY allow an older-version
report to suppress its own IGMPv3 or MLDv2 Membership Record. An
SSM-aware host, however, MUST NOT allow its report to be suppressed
in this situation (MODIFICATION). Suppressing reports in this
scenario would provide an avenue for an attacker to deny SSM service
to other hosts on the link.
2.2.2. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Reports
A host implementation may report more than one SSM channel in a
single report either by including multiple sources within a group
record or by including multiple group records.
A Group Record for a source-specific destination address may (under
normal operation) be any of the following types:
- MODE_IS_INCLUDE as part of a Current-State Record
- ALLOW_NEW_SOURCES as part of a State-Change Record
- BLOCK_OLD_SOURCES as part of a State-Change Record
A report may include both SSM destination addresses and non-source-
specific, i.e., Any-Source Multicast (ASM) destination addresses, in
the same message.
Additionally, a CHANGE_TO_INCLUDE_MODE record may be sent by a host
in some cases, for instance, when the SSM address range is changed
through configuration. A router should process such a record
according to the normal SFGMP rules.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
An SSM-aware host SHOULD NOT send any of the following record types
for an SSM address.
- MODE_IS_EXCLUDE as part of a Current-State Record
- CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE as part of a Filter-Mode-Change Record
This is a MODIFICATION to [IGMPv3, MLDv2], imposing a restriction on
its use for SSM destination addresses. The rationale is that EXCLUDE
mode does not apply to SSM addresses, and an SSM-aware router will
ignore MODE_IS_EXCLUDE and CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE requests in the SSM
range, as described below.
2.2.3. IGMPv1 Queries, IGMPv2 and MLDv1 General Queries
If an IGMPv1 Query, or an IGMPv2 or MLDv1 General Query is received,
the SFGMP protocol specifications require the host to revert to the
older (IGMPv1, IGMPv2, or MLDv1) mode of operation on that interface.
If this occurs, the host will stop reporting source-specific
subscriptions on that interface and will start using IGMPv1, IGMPv2,
or MLDv1 to report interest in all SSM destination addresses,
unqualified by a source address. As a result, SSM semantics will no
longer be applied to the multicast group address by the router.
A router compliant with this document would never generate an IGMPv1,
IGMPv2, or MLDv1 query for an address in the SSM range; thus, this
situation only occurs either if the router is not SSM-aware, or if
the host and the router disagree about the SSM address range (for
instance, if they have inconsistent manual configurations).
A host SHOULD log an error if it receives an IGMPv1, IGMPv2, or MLDv1
query for an SSM address (MODIFICATION).
In order to mitigate this problem, it must be administratively
assured that all routers on a given shared-medium network are
compliant with this document and are in agreement about the SSM
address range.
2.2.4. IGMPv2 Leave and MLDv1 Done
IGMP Leave and MLD Done messages are not processed by hosts. IGMPv2
Leave and MLDv1 Done messages should not be sent for an SSM address,
unless the sending host has reverted to older-version compatibility
mode, with all the caveats described above.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
2.2.5. IGMPv2 and MLDv1 Group Specific Query
If a host receives an IGMPv2 or MLDv1 Group Specific Query for an
address in any configured source-specific range, it should process
the query normally, as per [IGMPv3, MLDv2], even if the group queried
is a source-specific destination address. The transmission of such a
query likely indicates either that the sending router is not
compliant with this document or that it is not configured with the
same SSM address range(s) as the receiving host. A host SHOULD log
an error in this case (MODIFICATION).
2.2.6. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-Specific Query
If an SSM-aware host receives an SFGMP Group-Specific Query for an
SSM address, it must respond with a report if the group matches the
source-specific destination address of any of its subscribed source-
specific channels, as specified in [IGMPv3, MLDv2].
The rationale for this is that, although in the current SFGMP
protocol specifications a router would have no reason to send one,
the semantics of such a query are well-defined in this range and
future implementations may have reason to send such a query. Be
liberal in what you accept.
2.2.7. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-and-Source-Specific Query
An SFGMP router typically uses a Group-and-Source-Specific Query to
query an SSM channel that a host has requested to leave via a
BLOCK_OLD_SOURCES record. A host must respond to a Group-and-
Source-Specific Query for which the group and source in the query
match any channel for which the host has a subscription, as required
by [IGMPv3, MLDv2]. The use of an SSM address does not change this
behavior.
A host must be able to process a query with multiple sources listed
per group, again as required by [IGMPv3, MLDv2]. The use of an SSM
address does not modify the behavior of the SFGMPs in this regard.
3. Router Requirements for Source-Specific Multicast
Routers must be aware of the SSM address range in order to provide
the SSM service model. A router that knows the SSM address range and
is capable of applying SSM semantics to it as described in this
section is described as an "SSM-aware" router. An SSM-aware router
MAY have a configuration option to apply SSM semantics to addresses
other than the IANA-allocated range, but if such an option exists, it
MUST default to the IANA-allocated range.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
This section documents the behavior of routers with respect to the
following types of SFGMP messages for source-specific destination
addresses:
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Reports (3.1)
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 General Query (3.2)
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-Specific Query (3.3)
- IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-and-Source Specific Query (3.4)
- IGMPv1/v2 and MLDv1 Reports (3.5)
- IGMPv1/v2 and MLDv1 Queries (3.6)
- IGMPv2 Leave and MLDv1 Done (3.7)
3.1. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Reports
SFGMP Reports are used to report source-specific subscriptions in the
SSM address range. A router SHOULD ignore a group record of either
of the following types if it refers to an SSM destination address:
- MODE_IS_EXCLUDE Current-State Record
- CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE Filter-Mode-Change Record
A router MAY choose to log an error in either case. It MUST process
any other group records within the same report. These behaviors are
MODIFICATIONS to [IGMPv3, MLDv2] to prevent non-source-specific
semantics from being applied to SSM addresses, and to avoid reverting
to older-version compatibility mode.
A CHANGE_TO_INCLUDE_MODE Filter-Mode-Change Record is processed per
the normal SFGMP rules; Section 2.2.2 describes a legitimate scenario
when this could occur.
3.2. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 General Queries
An SSM router sends periodic SFGMP General Queries as per the IGMPv3
and MLDv2 specifications. No change in behavior is required for SSM.
3.3. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-Specific Queries
SFGMP routers that support source-specific multicast may send group-
specific queries for addresses in the source-specific range. This
specification does not explicitly prohibit such a message, although,
at the time of this writing, a router conformant to [IGMPv3, MLDv2]
would not send one.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
3.4. IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Group-and-Source-Specific Queries
SFGMP Group-and-Source-Specific Queries are used when a receiver has
indicated that it is no longer interested in receiving traffic from a
particular (S,G) pair to determine if there are any remaining
directly-attached hosts with interest in that (S,G) pair. Group-
and-Source-Specific Queries are used within the source-specific
address range when a router receives a BLOCK_OLD_SOURCES Record for
one or more source-specific groups. These queries are sent normally,
as per [IGMPv3, MLDv2].
3.5. IGMPv1/v2 and MLDv1 Reports
An IGMPv1/v2 or MLDv1 report for an address in the source-specific
range could be sent by a non-SSM-aware host. A router SHOULD ignore
all such reports and specifically SHOULD NOT use them to establish IP
forwarding state. This is a MODIFICATION to [IGMPv3, MLDv2]. A
router MAY log an error if it receives such a report (also a
MODIFICATION).
3.6. IGMPv1/v2 and MLDv1 Queries
An SFGMP router that loses the querier election to a lower version
router must log an error, as specified by [IGMPv3, MLDv2].
3.7. IGMPv2 Leave and MLDv1 Done
An IGMPv2 Leave or MLDv1 Done message may be sent by a non-SSM-aware
host. A router SHOULD ignore all such messages in the source-
specific address range and MAY log an error (MODIFICATION).
4. Security Considerations
The specific protocol modifications described in this document are
not known to create any security concerns that are not already
present when IGMPv3 or MLDv2 is used with ASM-style multicast. The
reader is referred to [SSM] for an analysis of SSM-specific security
issues.
It is important that a router not accept non-source-specific
reception requests for an SSM destination address. The rules of
[IGMPv3] and [MLDv2] require a router, upon receiving such a
membership report, to revert to earlier version compatibility mode
for the group in question. If the router were to revert in this
situation, it would prevent an IGMPv3-capable host from receiving SSM
service for that destination address, thus creating a potential for
an attacker to deny SSM service to other hosts on the same link.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
5. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Vince Laviano, Nidhi Bhaskar, Steve
Deering, Toerless Eckert, and Pekka Savola for their input and
careful review.
6. Normative References
[IGMPv2] Fenner, W., "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version
2", RFC 2236, November 1997.
[IGMPv3] Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol,
Version 3", RFC 3376, October 2002.
[MSFAPI] Thaler, D., Fenner, B., and B. Quinn, "Socket Interface
Extensions for Multicast Source Filters", RFC 3678,
January 2004.
[RFC1112] Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD
5, RFC 1112, August 1989.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[SSM] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for
IP", RFC 4607, August 2006.
[MLDv2] Vida, R. and L. Costa, "Multicast Listener Discovery
Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810, June 2004.
[RFC2710] Deering, S., Fenner, W., and B. Haberman, "Multicast
Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6", RFC 2710, October
1999.
8. Informative References
[IANA-ALLOC] Internet Assigned Numbers Authority,
http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses.
[RFC3306] Haberman, B. and D. Thaler, "Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6
Multicast Addresses", RFC 3306, August 2002.
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
Authors' Addresses
Hugh Holbrook
Arastra, Inc.
P.O. Box 10905
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: +1 650 331-1620
EMail: holbrook@arastra.com
Brad Cain
Acopia Networks
EMail: bcain99@gmail.com
Brian Haberman
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab
11100 Johns Hopkins Road
Laurel, MD 20723-6099
EMail: brian@innovationslab.net
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4604 IGMPv3/MLDv2 for SSM August 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Holbrook, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/
