[Docs] [txt|pdf] [draft-ietf-ccam...] [Tracker] [Diff1] [Diff2]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group T. Nadeau, Ed.
Request for Comment: 4802 Cisco Systems, Inc.
Category: Standards Track A. Farrel, Ed.
Old Dog Consulting
February 2007
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Traffic Engineering Management Information Base
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes managed objects for Generalized
Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS)-based traffic engineering.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
1.1. Migration Strategy .........................................3
2. Terminology .....................................................3
3. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................4
4. Outline .........................................................4
4.1. Summary of GMPLS Traffic Engineering MIB Module ............4
5. Brief Description of GMPLS TE MIB Objects .......................5
5.1. gmplsTunnelTable ...........................................5
5.2. gmplsTunnelHopTable ........................................6
5.3. gmplsTunnelARHopTable ......................................6
5.4. gmplsTunnelCHopTable .......................................6
5.5. gmplsTunnelErrorTable ......................................6
5.6. gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable ................................6
5.7. Use of 32-bit and 64-bit Counters ..........................7
6. Cross-referencing to the gmplsLabelTable ........................7
7. Example of GMPLS Tunnel Setup ...................................8
8. GMPLS Traffic Engineering MIB Module ...........................11
9. Security Considerations ........................................47
10. Acknowledgments ...............................................48
11. IANA Considerations ...........................................49
11.1. IANA Considerations for GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB .................49
11.2. Dependence on IANA MIB Modules ...........................49
11.2.1. IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB Definition ......................50
12. References ....................................................56
12.1. Normative References .....................................56
12.2. Informative References ...................................58
1. Introduction
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes managed objects for modeling Generalized
Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) [RFC3945] based traffic
engineering (TE). The tables and objects defined in this document
extend those defined in the equivalent document for MPLS traffic
engineering [RFC3812], and management of GMPLS traffic engineering is
built on management of MPLS traffic engineering.
The MIB modules in this document should be used in conjunction with
the companion document [RFC4803] for GMPLS-based traffic engineering
configuration and management.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, [RFC2119].
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
1.1. Migration Strategy
MPLS-TE Label Switched paths (LSPs) may be modeled and managed using
the MPLS-TE-STD-MIB module [RFC3812].
Label Switching Routers (LSRs) may be migrated to model and manage
their TE LSPs using the MIB modules in this document in order to
migrate the LSRs to GMPLS support, or to take advantage of additional
MIB objects defined in these MIB modules that are applicable to
MPLS-TE.
The GMPLS TE MIB module (GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB) defined in this document
extends the MPLS-TE-STD-MIB module [RFC3812] through a series of
augmentations and sparse augmentations of the MIB tables. The only
additions are for support of GMPLS or to support the increased
complexity of MPLS and GMPLS systems.
In order to migrate from MPLS-TE-STD-MIB support to GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB
support, an implementation needs only to add support for the
additional tables and objects defined in GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB. The
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding may be set to tunnelLspNotGmpls to allow an
MPLS-TE LSP tunnel to benefit from the additional objects and tables
of GMPLS-LSR-STD-MIB without supporting the GMPLS protocols.
The companion document for modeling and managing GMPLS-based LSRs
[RFC4803] extends the MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB module [RFC3813] with the same
intentions.
Textual conventions are defined in [RFC3811] and the IANA-GMPLS-TC-
MIB module.
2. Terminology
This document uses terminology from the MPLS architecture document
[RFC3031], from the GMPLS architecture document [RFC3945], and from
the MPLS Traffic Engineering MIB [RFC3812]. Some frequently used
terms are described next.
An explicitly routed LSP (ERLSP) is referred to as a GMPLS tunnel.
It consists of in-segment(s) and/or out-segment(s) at the
egress/ingress LSRs, each segment being associated with one GMPLS-
enabled interface. These are also referred to as tunnel segments.
Additionally, at an intermediate LSR, we model a connection as
consisting of one or more in-segments and/or one or more out-
segments. The binding or interconnection between in-segments and
out-segments is performed using a cross-connect.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
These segment and cross-connect objects are defined in the MPLS Label
Switching Router MIB (MPLS-LSR-STD-MIB) [RFC3813], but see also the
GMPLS Label Switching Router MIB (GMPLS-LSR-STD-MIB) [RFC4803] for
the GMPLS-specific extensions to these objects.
3. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
[RFC2580].
4. Outline
Support for GMPLS traffic-engineered tunnels requires the following
configuration.
- Setting up tunnels with appropriate MPLS configuration parameters
using [RFC3812].
- Extending the tunnel definitions with GMPLS configuration
parameters.
- Configuring loose and strict source routed tunnel hops.
These actions may need to be accompanied with corresponding actions
using [RFC3813] and [RFC4803] to establish and configure tunnel
segments, if this is done manually. Also, the in-segment and out-
segment performance tables, mplsInSegmentPerfTable and
mplsOutSegmentPerfTable [RFC3813], should be used to determine
performance of the tunnels and tunnel segments, although it should be
noted that those tables may not be appropriate for measuring
performance on some types of GMPLS links.
4.1. Summary of GMPLS Traffic Engineering MIB Module
The following tables contain MIB objects for performing the actions
listed above when they cannot be performed solely using MIB objects
defined in MPLS-TE-STD-MIB [RFC3812].
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
- Tunnel table (gmplsTunnelTable) for providing GMPLS-specific
tunnel configuration parameters.
- Tunnel hop, actual tunnel hop, and computed tunnel hop tables
(gmplsTunnelHopTable, gmplsTunnelARHopTable, and
gmplsTunnelCHopTable) for providing additional configuration of
strict and loose source routed tunnel hops.
- Performance and error reporting tables
(gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable and gmplsTunnelErrorTable).
These tables are described in the subsequent sections.
Additionally, the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module contains a new
notification.
- The GMPLS Tunnel Down Notification (gmplsTunnelDown) should be
used for all GMPLS tunnels in place of the mplsTunnelDown
notification defined in [RFC3812]. An implementation must not
issue both the gmplsTunnelDown and the mplsTunnelDown
notifications for the same event. As well as indicating that a
tunnel has transitioned to operational down state, this new
notification indicates the cause of the failure.
5. Brief Description of GMPLS TE MIB Objects
The objects described in this section support the functionality
described in [RFC3473] and [RFC3472] for GMPLS tunnels. The tables
support both manually configured and signaled tunnels.
5.1. gmplsTunnelTable
The gmplsTunnelTable extends the MPLS traffic engineering MIB module
(MPLS-TE-STD-MIB [RFC3812]) to allow GMPLS tunnels to be created
between an LSR and a remote endpoint, and existing GMPLS tunnels to
be reconfigured or removed.
Note that we only support point-to-point tunnel segments, although
multipoint-to-point and point-to-multipoint connections are supported
by an LSR acting as a cross-connect.
Each tunnel can thus have one out-segment originating at an LSR
and/or one in-segment terminating at that LSR.
Three objects within this table utilize enumerations in order to map
to enumerations that are used in GMPLS signaling. In order to
protect the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module from changes (in particular,
extensions) to the range of enumerations supported by the signaling
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
protocols, these MIB objects use textual conventions with values
maintained by IANA. For further details, see the IANA Considerations
section of this document.
5.2. gmplsTunnelHopTable
The gmplsTunnelHopTable is used to indicate additional parameters for
the hops, strict or loose, of a GMPLS tunnel defined in the
gmplsTunnelTable, when it is established using signaling. Multiple
tunnels may share hops by pointing to the same entry in this table.
5.3. gmplsTunnelARHopTable
The gmplsTunnelARHopTable is used to indicate the actual hops
traversed by a tunnel as reported by the signaling protocol after the
tunnel is set up. The support of this table is optional since not
all GMPLS signaling protocols support this feature.
5.4. gmplsTunnelCHopTable
The gmplsTunnelCHopTable lists the actual hops computed by a
constraint-based routing algorithm based on the gmplsTunnelHopTable.
The support of this table is optional since not all implementations
support computation of hop lists using a constraint-based routing
protocol.
5.5. gmplsTunnelErrorTable
The gmplsTunnelErrorTable provides access to information about the
last error that occurred on each tunnel known about by the MIB. It
indicates the nature of the error and when and how it was reported,
and it can give recovery advice through an admin string.
5.6. gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable
The gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable provides additional counters to
measure the performance of bidirectional GMPLS tunnels in which
packets are visible. It supplements the counters in
mplsTunnelPerfTable and augments gmplsTunnelTable.
Note that not all counters may be appropriate or available for some
types of tunnel.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
5.7. Use of 32-bit and 64-bit Counters
64-bit counters are provided in the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module for
high-speed interfaces where the use of 32-bit counters might be
impractical. The requirements on the use of 32-bit and 64-bit
counters (copied verbatim from [RFC2863]) are as follows:
For interfaces that operate at 20,000,000 (20 million) bits per
second or less, 32-bit byte and packet counters MUST be supported.
For interfaces that operate faster than 20,000,000 bits/second,
and slower than 650,000,000 bits/second, 32-bit packet counters
MUST be supported and 64-bit octet counters MUST be supported.
For interfaces that operate at 650,000,000 bits/second or faster,
64-bit packet counters AND 64-bit octet counters MUST be
supported.
6. Cross-referencing to the gmplsLabelTable
The gmplsLabelTable is found in the GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB module in
[RFC4803] and provides a way to model labels in a GMPLS system where
labels might not be simple 32-bit integers.
The hop tables in this document (gmplsTunnelHopTable,
gmplsTunnelCHopTable, and gmplsTunnelARHopTable) and the segment
tables in [RFC3813] (mplsInSegmentTable and mplsOutSegmentTable)
contain objects with syntax MplsLabel.
MplsLabel (defined in [RFC3811]) is a 32-bit integer that is capable
of representing any MPLS Label and most GMPLS Labels. However, some
GMPLS Labels are larger than 32 bits and may be of arbitrary length.
Furthermore, some labels that may be safely encoded in 32 bits are
constructed from multiple sub-fields. Additionally, some GMPLS
technologies support the concatenation of individual labels to
represent a data flow carried as multiple sub-flows.
These GMPLS cases require that something other than a simple 32-bit
integer be made available to represent the labels. This is achieved
through the gmplsLabelTable contained in the GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB
[RFC4803].
The tables in this document and [RFC3813] that include objects with
syntax MplsLabel also include companion objects that are row
pointers. If the row pointer is set to zeroDotZero (0.0), then an
object of syntax MplsLabel contains the label encoded as a 32-bit
integer. But otherwise the row pointer indicates a row in another
MIB table that includes the label. In these cases, the row pointer
may indicate a row in the gmplsLabelTable.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
This provides both a good way to support legacy systems that
implement MPLS-TE-STD-MIB [RFC3812], and a significant simplification
in GMPLS systems that are limited to a single, simple label type.
Note that gmplsLabelTable supports concatenated labels through the
use of a label sub-index (gmplsLabelSubindex).
7. Example of GMPLS Tunnel Setup
This section contains an example of which MIB objects should be
modified to create a GMPLS tunnel. This example shows a best effort,
loosely routed, bidirectional traffic engineered tunnel, which spans
two hops of a simple network, uses Generalized Label requests with
Lambda encoding, has label recording and shared link layer
protection. Note that these objects should be created on the "head-
end" LSR.
First in the mplsTunnelTable:
{
mplsTunnelIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelInstance = 1,
mplsTunnelIngressLSRId = 192.0.2.1,
mplsTunnelEgressLSRId = 192.0.2.2,
mplsTunnelName = "My first tunnel",
mplsTunnelDescr = "Here to there and back again",
mplsTunnelIsIf = true(1),
mplsTunnelXCPointer = mplsXCIndex.3.0.0.12,
mplsTunnelSignallingProto = none(1),
mplsTunnelSetupPrio = 0,
mplsTunnelHoldingPrio = 0,
mplsTunnelSessionAttributes = recordRoute(4),
mplsTunnelOwner = snmp(2),
mplsTunnelLocalProtectInUse = false(2),
mplsTunnelResourcePointer = mplsTunnelResourceIndex.6,
mplsTunnelInstancePriority = 1,
mplsTunnelHopTableIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelPrimaryInstance = 0,
mplsTunnelIncludeAnyAffinity = 0,
mplsTunnelIncludeAllAffinity = 0,
mplsTunnelExcludeAnyAffinity = 0,
mplsTunnelPathInUse = 1,
mplsTunnelRole = head(1),
mplsTunnelRowStatus = createAndWait(5),
}
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
In gmplsTunnelTable(1,1,192.0.2.1,192.0.2.2):
{
gmplsTunnelUnnumIf = true(1),
gmplsTunnelAttributes = labelRecordingRequired(1),
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding = tunnelLspLambda,
gmplsTunnelSwitchingType = lsc,
gmplsTunnelLinkProtection = shared(2),
gmplsTunnelGPid = lambda,
gmplsTunnelSecondary = false(2),
gmplsTunnelDirection = bidirectional(1)
gmplsTunnelPathComp = explicit(2),
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType = ipv4(1),
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient = 'C0000201'H,
gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags = 0,
gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr = 0.0
}
Entries in the mplsTunnelResourceTable, mplsTunnelHopTable, and
gmplsTunnelHopTable are created and activated at this time.
In mplsTunnelResourceTable:
{
mplsTunnelResourceIndex = 6,
mplsTunnelResourceMaxRate = 0,
mplsTunnelResourceMeanRate = 0,
mplsTunnelResourceMaxBurstSize = 0,
mplsTunnelResourceRowStatus = createAndGo(4)
}
The next two instances of mplsTunnelHopEntry are used to denote the
hops this tunnel will take across the network.
The following denotes the beginning of the network, or the first hop
in our example. We have used the fictitious LSR identified by
"192.0.2.1" as our head-end router.
In mplsTunnelHopTable:
{
mplsTunnelHopListIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelPathOptionIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelHopIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelHopAddrType = ipv4(1),
mplsTunnelHopIpv4Addr = 192.0.2.1,
mplsTunnelHopIpv4PrefixLen = 9,
mplsTunnelHopType = strict(1),
mplsTunnelHopRowStatus = createAndWait(5),
}
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
The following denotes the end of the network, or the last hop in our
example. We have used the fictitious LSR identified by "192.0.2.2"
as our tail-end router.
In mplsTunnelHopTable:
{
mplsTunnelHopListIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelPathOptionIndex = 1,
mplsTunnelHopIndex = 2,
mplsTunnelHopAddrType = ipv4(1),
mplsTunnelHopIpv4Addr = 192.0.2.2,
mplsTunnelHopIpv4PrefixLen = 9,
mplsTunnelHopType = loose(2),
mplsTunnelHopRowStatus = createAndGo(4)
}
Now an associated entry in the gmplsTunnelHopTable is created to
provide additional GMPLS hop configuration indicating that the first
hop is an unnumbered link using Explicit Forward and Reverse Labels.
An entry in the gmplsLabelTable is created first to include the
Explicit Label.
In gmplsLabelTable:
{
gmplsLabelInterface = 2,
gmplsLabelIndex = 1,
gmplsLabelSubindex = 0,
gmplsLabelType = gmplsFreeformLabel(3),
gmplsLabelFreeform = 0xFEDCBA9876543210
gmplsLabelRowStatus = createAndGo(4)
}
In gmplsTunnelHopTable(1,1,1):
{
gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses = forwardPresent(0)
+reversePresent(1),
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr = gmplsLabelTable(2,1,0)
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr = gmplsLabelTable(2,1,0)
}
The first hop is now activated:
In mplsTunnelHopTable(1,1,1):
{
mplsTunnelHopRowStatus = active(1)
}
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
No gmplsTunnelHopEntry is created for the second hop as it contains
no special GMPLS features.
Finally, the mplsTunnelEntry is activated:
In mplsTunnelTable(1,1,192.0.2.1,192.0.2.2)
{
mplsTunnelRowStatus = active(1)
}
8. GMPLS Traffic Engineering MIB Module
This MIB module makes reference to the following documents:
[RFC2205], [RFC2578], [RFC2579], [RFC2580], [RFC3209], [RFC3411],
[RFC3471], [RFC3473], [RFC3477], [RFC3812], [RFC4001], and [RFC4202].
GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE,
Unsigned32, Counter32, Counter64, zeroDotZero, Gauge32
FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- RFC 2578
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF -- RFC 2580
TruthValue, TimeStamp, RowPointer
FROM SNMPv2-TC -- RFC 2579
InetAddress, InetAddressType
FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB -- RFC 4001
SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB -- RFC 3411
mplsTunnelIndex, mplsTunnelInstance, mplsTunnelIngressLSRId,
mplsTunnelEgressLSRId, mplsTunnelHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelHopPathOptionIndex, mplsTunnelHopIndex,
mplsTunnelARHopListIndex, mplsTunnelARHopIndex,
mplsTunnelCHopListIndex, mplsTunnelCHopIndex,
mplsTunnelEntry,
mplsTunnelAdminStatus, mplsTunnelOperStatus,
mplsTunnelGroup, mplsTunnelScalarGroup
FROM MPLS-TE-STD-MIB -- RFC3812
IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC, IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC,
IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC, IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC
FROM IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB
mplsStdMIB
FROM MPLS-TC-STD-MIB -- RFC 3811
;
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTeStdMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED
"200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
ORGANIZATION
"IETF Common Control and Measurement Plane (CCAMP) Working
Group"
CONTACT-INFO
" Thomas D. Nadeau
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: tnadeau@cisco.com
Adrian Farrel
Old Dog Consulting
Email: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Comments about this document should be emailed directly
to the CCAMP working group mailing list at
ccamp@ops.ietf.org."
DESCRIPTION
"Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). This version of
this MIB module is part of RFC 4802; see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.
This MIB module contains managed object definitions
for GMPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) as defined in:
1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Functional Description, Berger, L. (Editor),
RFC 3471, January 2003.
2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, Berger,
L. (Editor), RFC 3473, January 2003.
"
REVISION
"200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version issued as part of RFC 4802."
::= { mplsStdMIB 13 }
gmplsTeNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 0 }
gmplsTeScalars OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 1 }
gmplsTeObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 2 }
gmplsTeConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeStdMIB 3 }
gmplsTunnelsConfigured OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of GMPLS tunnels configured on this device. A GMPLS
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
tunnel is considered configured if an entry for the tunnel
exists in the gmplsTunnelTable and the associated
mplsTunnelRowStatus is active(1)."
::= { gmplsTeScalars 1 }
gmplsTunnelsActive OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of GMPLS tunnels active on this device. A GMPLS
tunnel is considered active if there is an entry in the
gmplsTunnelTable and the associated mplsTunnelOperStatus for the
tunnel is up(1)."
::= { gmplsTeScalars 2 }
gmplsTunnelTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelTable sparsely extends the mplsTunnelTable of
MPLS-TE-STD-MIB. It allows GMPLS tunnels to be created between
an LSR and a remote endpoint, and existing tunnels to be
reconfigured or removed.
Note that only point-to-point tunnel segments are supported,
although multipoint-to-point and point-to-multipoint
connections are supported by an LSR acting as a cross-connect.
Each tunnel can thus have one out-segment originating at this
LSR and/or one in-segment terminating at this LSR.
The row status of an entry in this table is controlled by the
mplsTunnelRowStatus in the corresponding entry in the
mplsTunnelTable. When the corresponding mplsTunnelRowStatus has
value active(1), a row in this table may not be created or
modified.
The exception to this rule is the
gmplsTunnelAdminStatusInformation object, which can be modified
while the tunnel is active."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
::= { gmplsTeObjects 1 }
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX GmplsTunnelEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table in association with the corresponding
entry in the mplsTunnelTable represents a GMPLS tunnel.
An entry can be created by a network administrator via SNMP SET
commands, or in response to signaling protocol events."
INDEX {
mplsTunnelIndex,
mplsTunnelInstance,
mplsTunnelIngressLSRId,
mplsTunnelEgressLSRId
}
::= { gmplsTunnelTable 1 }
GmplsTunnelEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
gmplsTunnelUnnumIf TruthValue,
gmplsTunnelAttributes BITS,
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC,
gmplsTunnelSwitchingType IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC,
gmplsTunnelLinkProtection BITS,
gmplsTunnelGPid IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC,
gmplsTunnelSecondary TruthValue,
gmplsTunnelDirection INTEGER,
gmplsTunnelPathComp INTEGER,
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType,
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient InetAddress,
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType,
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient InetAddress,
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType,
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient InetAddress,
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType InetAddressType,
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient InetAddress,
gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC,
gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr RowPointer
}
gmplsTunnelUnnumIf OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TruthValue
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Denotes whether or not this tunnel corresponds to an unnumbered
interface represented by an entry in the interfaces group table
(the ifTable) with ifType set to mpls(166).
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
This object is only used if mplsTunnelIsIf is set to 'true'.
If both this object and the mplsTunnelIsIf object are set to
'true', the originating LSR adds an LSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE_ID
object to the outgoing Path message.
This object contains information that is only used by the
terminating LSR."
REFERENCE
"1. Signalling Unnumbered Links in RSVP-TE, RFC 3477."
DEFVAL { false }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 1 }
gmplsTunnelAttributes OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS {
labelRecordingDesired(0)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates optional parameters for this tunnel.
These bits should be taken in addition to those defined in
mplsTunnelSessionAttributes in order to determine the full set
of options to be signaled (for example SESSION_ATTRIBUTES flags
in RSVP-TE). The following describes these bitfields:
labelRecordingDesired
This flag is set to indicate that label information should be
included when doing a route record. This bit is not valid
unless the recordRoute bit is set."
REFERENCE
"1. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
sections 4.4.3, 4.7.1, and 4.7.2."
DEFVAL { { } }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 2 }
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates the encoding of the LSP being requested.
A value of 'tunnelLspNotGmpls' indicates that GMPLS signaling is
not in use. Some objects in this MIB module may be of use for
MPLS signaling extensions that do not use GMPLS signaling. By
setting this object to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls', an application may
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
indicate that only those objects meaningful in MPLS should be
examined.
The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC found in the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB
module."
DEFVAL { tunnelLspNotGmpls }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 3 }
gmplsTunnelSwitchingType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the type of switching that should be performed on
a particular link. This field is needed for links that
advertise more than one type of switching capability.
The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC found in the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module.
This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncodingType
is not set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 4 }
gmplsTunnelLinkProtection OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS {
extraTraffic(0),
unprotected(1),
shared(2),
dedicatedOneToOne(3),
dedicatedOnePlusOne(4),
enhanced(5)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the level of link protection required. A
value of zero (no bits set) indicates that any protection may be
used. The following describes these bitfields:
extraTraffic
This flag is set to indicate that the LSP should use links
that are protecting other (primary) traffic. Such LSPs may be
preempted when the links carrying the (primary) traffic being
protected fail.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
unprotected
This flag is set to indicate that the LSP should not use any
link layer protection.
shared
This flag is set to indicate that a shared link layer
protection scheme, such as 1:N protection, should be used to
support the LSP.
dedicatedOneToOne
This flag is set to indicate that a dedicated link layer
protection scheme, i.e., 1:1 protection, should be used to
support the LSP.
dedicatedOnePlusOne
This flag is set to indicate that a dedicated link layer
protection scheme, i.e., 1+1 protection, should be used to
support the LSP.
enhanced
This flag is set to indicate that a protection scheme that is
more reliable than Dedicated 1+1 should be used, e.g., 4 fiber
BLSR/MS-SPRING.
This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is
not set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 7.1."
DEFVAL { { } }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 5 }
gmplsTunnelGPid OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates the payload carried by the LSP. It is only
required when GMPLS will be used for this LSP.
The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC found in the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module.
This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is not
set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 6 }
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelSecondary OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TruthValue
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates that the requested LSP is a secondary LSP.
This object is only meaningful if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is not
set to 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 7.1."
DEFVAL { false }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 7 }
gmplsTunnelDirection OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
forward(0),
bidirectional(1)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Whether this tunnel carries forward data only (is
unidirectional) or is bidirectional.
Values of this object other than 'forward' are meaningful
only if gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is not set to
'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
DEFVAL { forward }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 8 }
gmplsTunnelPathComp OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
dynamicFull(1), -- CSPF fully computed
explicit(2), -- fully specified path
dynamicPartial(3) -- CSPF partially computed
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This value instructs the source node on how to perform path
computation on the explicit route specified by the associated
entries in the gmplsTunnelHopTable.
dynamicFull
The user specifies at least the source and
destination of the path and expects that the Constrained
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
Shortest Path First (CSPF) will calculate the remainder
of the path.
explicit
The user specifies the entire path for the tunnel to
take. This path may contain strict or loose hops.
Evaluation of the explicit route will be performed
hop by hop through the network.
dynamicPartial
The user specifies at least the source and
destination of the path and expects that the CSPF
will calculate the remainder of the path. The path
computed by CSPF is allowed to be only partially
computed allowing the remainder of the path to be
filled in across the network.
When an entry is present in the gmplsTunnelTable for a
tunnel, gmplsTunnelPathComp MUST be used and any
corresponding mplsTunnelHopEntryPathComp object in the
mplsTunnelHopTable MUST be ignored and SHOULD not be set.
mplsTunnelHopTable and mplsTunnelHopEntryPathComp are part of
MPLS-TE-STD-MIB.
This object should be ignored if the value of
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding is 'tunnelLspNotGmpls'."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
DEFVAL { dynamicFull }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 9 }
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object is used to aid in interpretation of
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 10 }
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
"Indicates the address of the upstream recipient for Notify
messages relating to this tunnel and issued by this LSR. This
information is typically received from an upstream LSR in a Path
message.
This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using RSVP.
It is also not valid at the head end of a tunnel since there are
no upstream LSRs to which to send a Notify message.
This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set to
0, the value of gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType MUST be
set to unknown(0)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 4.2. "
DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 11 }
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object is used to aid in interpretation of
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 12 }
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates to an upstream LSR the address to which it should send
downstream Notify messages relating to this tunnel.
This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using RSVP.
It is also not valid at the head end of the tunnel since no Resv
messages are sent from that LSR for this tunnel.
If set to 0, no Notify Request object will be included in the
outgoing Resv messages.
This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set to
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
0, the value of gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType MUST be
set to unknown(0)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 4.2. "
DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 13 }
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object is used to aid in interpretation of
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 14 }
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the address of the downstream recipient for Notify
messages relating to this tunnel and issued by this LSR. This
information is typically received from an upstream LSR in a Resv
message. This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using
RSVP.
It is also not valid at the tail end of a tunnel since there are
no downstream LSRs to which to send a Notify message.
This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set
to 0, the value of gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType MUST
be set to unknown(0)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 4.2.
"
DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 15 }
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
"This object is used to aid in interpretation of
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient."
DEFVAL { unknown }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 16 }
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates to a downstream LSR the address to which it should
send upstream Notify messages relating to this tunnel.
This object is only valid when signaling a tunnel using RSVP.
It is also not valid at the tail end of the tunnel since no Path
messages are sent from that LSR for this tunnel.
If set to 0, no Notify Request object will be included in the
outgoing Path messages.
This object is interpreted in the context of the value of
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType. If this object is set to
0, the value of gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType MUST be
set to unknown(0)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 4.2. "
DEFVAL { '00000000'H } -- 0.0.0.0
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 17 }
gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Determines the setting of the Admin Status flags in the
Admin Status object or TLV, as described in RFC 3471. Setting
this field to a non-zero value will result in the inclusion of
the Admin Status object on signaling messages.
The values to use are defined in the TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC found in the
IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module.
This value of this object can be modified when the
corresponding mplsTunnelRowStatus and mplsTunnelAdminStatus
is active(1). By doing so, a new signaling message will be
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
triggered including the requested Admin Status object or
TLV."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 8."
DEFVAL { { } }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 18 }
gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Some tunnels will run over transports that can usefully support
technology-specific additional parameters (for example,
Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) resource usage). Such
parameters can be supplied in an external table and referenced
from here.
A value of zeroDotzero in this attribute indicates that there
is no such additional information."
DEFVAL { zeroDotZero }
::= { gmplsTunnelEntry 19 }
gmplsTunnelHopTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelHopEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelHopTable sparsely extends the mplsTunnelHopTable
of MPLS-TE-STD-MIB. It is used to indicate the Explicit Labels
to be used in an explicit path for a GMPLS tunnel defined in the
mplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelTable, when it is established
using signaling. It does not insert new hops, but does define
new values for hops defined in the mplsTunnelHopTable.
Each row in this table is indexed by the same indexes as in the
mplsTunnelHopTable. It is acceptable for some rows in the
mplsTunnelHopTable to have corresponding entries in this table
and some to have no corresponding entry in this table.
The storage type for this entry is given by the value
of mplsTunnelHopStorageType in the corresponding entry in the
mplsTunnelHopTable.
The row status of an entry in this table is controlled by
mplsTunnelHopRowStatus in the corresponding entry in the
mplsTunnelHopTable. That is, it is not permitted to create a row
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
in this table, or to modify an existing row, when the
corresponding mplsTunnelHopRowStatus has the value active(1)."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812.
2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473.
"
::= { gmplsTeObjects 2 }
gmplsTunnelHopEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX GmplsTunnelHopEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table represents additions to a tunnel hop
defined in mplsTunnelHopEntry. At an ingress to a tunnel, an
entry in this table is created by a network administrator for an
ERLSP to be set up by a signaling protocol. At transit and
egress nodes, an entry in this table may be used to represent the
explicit path instructions received using the signaling
protocol."
INDEX {
mplsTunnelHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelHopPathOptionIndex,
mplsTunnelHopIndex
}
::= { gmplsTunnelHopTable 1 }
GmplsTunnelHopEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses BITS,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr RowPointer,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr RowPointer
}
gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS {
forwardPresent(0),
reversePresent(1)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the presence of labels indicated by the
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel or
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr, and
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel or
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr objects.
For the Present bits, a set bit indicates that a label is
present for this hop in the route. This allows zero to be a
valid label value."
DEFVAL { { } }
::= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 1 }
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a Forward
Label is present and gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr
contains the value zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this
hop is represented by the value of this object."
::= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 2 }
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
in the forward direction.
If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present and this object contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel object."
DEFVAL { zeroDotZero }
::= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 3 }
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present and
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in
this object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
::= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 4 }
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
in the reverse direction.
If the gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present and this object contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel object."
DEFVAL { zeroDotZero }
::= { gmplsTunnelHopEntry 5 }
gmplsTunnelARHopTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelARHopEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelARHopTable sparsely extends the
mplsTunnelARHopTable of MPLS-TE-STD-MIB. It is used to
indicate the labels currently in use for a GMPLS tunnel
defined in the mplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelTable, as
reported by the signaling protocol. It does not insert
new hops, but does define new values for hops defined in
the mplsTunnelARHopTable.
Each row in this table is indexed by the same indexes as in the
mplsTunnelARHopTable. It is acceptable for some rows in the
mplsTunnelARHopTable to have corresponding entries in this table
and some to have no corresponding entry in this table.
Note that since the information necessary to build entries
within this table is not provided by some signaling protocols
and might not be returned in all cases of other signaling
protocols, implementation of this table and the
mplsTunnelARHopTable is optional. Furthermore, since the
information in this table is actually provided by the
signaling protocol after the path has been set up, the entries
in this table are provided only for observation, and hence,
all variables in this table are accessible exclusively as
read-only."
REFERENCE
"1. Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473.
3. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
::= { gmplsTeObjects 3 }
gmplsTunnelARHopEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX GmplsTunnelARHopEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table represents additions to a tunnel hop
visible in mplsTunnelARHopEntry. An entry is created by the
signaling protocol for a signaled ERLSP set up by the signaling
protocol.
At any node on the LSP (ingress, transit, or egress), this table
and the mplsTunnelARHopTable (if the tables are supported and if
the signaling protocol is recording actual route information)
contain the actual route of the whole tunnel. If the signaling
protocol is not recording the actual route, this table MAY
report the information from the gmplsTunnelHopTable or the
gmplsTunnelCHopTable.
Note that the recording of actual labels is distinct from the
recording of the actual route in some signaling protocols. This
feature is enabled using the gmplsTunnelAttributes object."
INDEX {
mplsTunnelARHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelARHopIndex
}
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopTable 1 }
GmplsTunnelARHopEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses BITS,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr RowPointer,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr RowPointer,
gmplsTunnelARHopProtection BITS
}
gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS {
forwardPresent(0),
reversePresent(1),
forwardGlobal(2),
reverseGlobal(3)
}
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the presence and status of labels
indicated by the gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel or
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr, and
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel or
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr objects.
For the Present bits, a set bit indicates that a label is
present for this hop in the route.
For the Global bits, a set bit indicates that the label comes
from the Global Label Space; a clear bit indicates that this is
a Per-Interface label. A Global bit only has meaning if the
corresponding Present bit is set."
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 1 }
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present and
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in this
object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 2 }
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label in use on this hop
in the forward direction.
If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present and this object contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in the
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel object."
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 3 }
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present and
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in this
object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 4 }
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label in use on this hop
in the reverse direction.
If the gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present and this object contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label in use on this hop is found in the
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel object."
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 5 }
gmplsTunnelARHopProtection OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS {
localAvailable(0),
localInUse(1)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Availability and usage of protection on the reported link.
localAvailable
This flag is set to indicate that the link downstream of this
node is protected via a local repair mechanism.
localInUse
This flag is set to indicate that a local repair mechanism is
in use to maintain this tunnel (usually in the face of an
outage of the link it was previously routed over)."
REFERENCE
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
"1. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
section 4.4.1."
::= { gmplsTunnelARHopEntry 6 }
gmplsTunnelCHopTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelCHopEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The gmplsTunnelCHopTable sparsely extends the
mplsTunnelCHopTable of MPLS-TE-STD-MIB. It is used to indicate
additional information about the hops of a GMPLS tunnel defined
in the mplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelTable, as computed by a
constraint-based routing protocol, based on the
mplsTunnelHopTable and the gmplsTunnelHopTable.
Each row in this table is indexed by the same indexes as in the
mplsTunnelCHopTable. It is acceptable for some rows in the
mplsTunnelCHopTable to have corresponding entries in this table
and some to have no corresponding entry in this table.
Please note that since the information necessary to build
entries within this table may not be supported by some LSRs,
implementation of this table is optional.
Furthermore, since the information in this table is actually
provided by a path computation component after the path has been
computed, the entries in this table are provided only for
observation, and hence, all objects in this table are accessible
exclusively as read-only."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812.
2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473."
::= { gmplsTeObjects 4 }
gmplsTunnelCHopEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX GmplsTunnelCHopEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table represents additions to a computed tunnel
hop visible in mplsTunnelCHopEntry. An entry is created by a
path computation component based on the hops specified in the
corresponding mplsTunnelHopTable and gmplsTunnelHopTable.
At a transit LSR, this table (if the table is supported) MAY
contain the path computed by a path computation engine on (or on
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
behalf of) the transit LSR."
INDEX {
mplsTunnelCHopListIndex,
mplsTunnelCHopIndex
}
::= { gmplsTunnelCHopTable 1 }
GmplsTunnelCHopEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses BITS,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr RowPointer,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr RowPointer
}
gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX BITS {
forwardPresent(0),
reversePresent(1)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This bitmask indicates the presence of labels indicated by the
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel or
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr and
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel or
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr objects.
A set bit indicates that a label is present for this hop in the
route, thus allowing zero to be a valid label value."
::= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 1 }
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present and
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in this
object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
::= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 2 }
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
in the forward direction.
If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Forward Label is present and this object contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel object."
::= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 3 }
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present and
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in this
object encoded as a 32-bit integer."
::= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 4 }
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present, this object contains a pointer to a
row in another MIB table (such as the gmplsLabelTable of
GMPLS-LABEL-STD-MIB) that contains the label to use on this hop
in the reverse direction.
If the gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses object indicates that a
Reverse Label is present and this object contains the value
zeroDotZero, then the label to use on this hop is found in the
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel object."
::= { gmplsTunnelCHopEntry 5 }
gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
"This table augments the gmplsTunnelTable to provide
per-tunnel packet performance information for the reverse
direction of a bidirectional tunnel. It can be seen as
supplementing the mplsTunnelPerfTable, which augments the
mplsTunnelTable.
For links that do not transport packets, these packet counters
cannot be maintained. For such links, attempts to read the
objects in this table will return noSuchInstance.
A tunnel can be known to be bidirectional by inspecting the
gmplsTunnelDirection object."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
::= { gmplsTeObjects 5 }
gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX GmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table is created by the LSR for every
bidirectional GMPLS tunnel where packets are visible to the
LSR."
AUGMENTS { gmplsTunnelEntry }
::= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable 1 }
GmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
gmplsTunnelReversePerfPackets Counter32,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets Counter64,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfErrors Counter32,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfBytes Counter32,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes Counter64
}
gmplsTunnelReversePerfPackets OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Number of packets forwarded on the tunnel in the reverse
direction if it is bidirectional.
This object represents the 32-bit value of the least
significant part of the 64-bit value if both
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets and this object are returned.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
cannot be maintained. For such links, this value will return
noSuchInstance."
::= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 1 }
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter64
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"High-capacity counter for number of packets forwarded on the
tunnel in the reverse direction if it is bidirectional.
For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
cannot be maintained. For such links, this value will return
noSuchInstance."
::= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 2 }
gmplsTunnelReversePerfErrors OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Number of errored packets received on the tunnel in the reverse
direction if it is bidirectional. For links that do not
transport packets, this packet counter cannot be maintained. For
such links, this value will return noSuchInstance."
::= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 3 }
gmplsTunnelReversePerfBytes OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Number of bytes forwarded on the tunnel in the reverse direction
if it is bidirectional.
This object represents the 32-bit value of the least
significant part of the 64-bit value if both
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes and this object are returned.
For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
cannot be maintained. For such links, this value will return
noSuchInstance."
::= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 4 }
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter64
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"High-capacity counter for number of bytes forwarded on the
tunnel in the reverse direction if it is bidirectional.
For links that do not transport packets, this packet counter
cannot be maintained. For such links, this value will return
noSuchInstance."
::= { gmplsTunnelReversePerfEntry 5 }
gmplsTunnelErrorTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF GmplsTunnelErrorEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This table augments the mplsTunnelTable.
This table provides per-tunnel information about errors. Errors
may be detected locally or reported through the signaling
protocol. Error reporting is not exclusive to GMPLS, and this
table may be applied in MPLS systems.
Entries in this table are not persistent over system resets
or re-initializations of the management system."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
::= { gmplsTeObjects 6 }
gmplsTunnelErrorEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX GmplsTunnelErrorEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table is created by the LSR for every tunnel
where error information is visible to the LSR.
Note that systems that read the objects in this table one at
a time and do not perform atomic operations to read entire
instantiated table rows at once, should, for each conceptual
column with valid data, read gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime
prior to the other objects in the row and again subsequent to
reading the last object of the row. They should verify that
the value of gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime did not change and
thereby ensure that all data read belongs to the same error
event."
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
AUGMENTS { mplsTunnelEntry }
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorTable 1 }
GmplsTunnelErrorEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType INTEGER,
gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime TimeStamp,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType InetAddressType,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporter InetAddress,
gmplsTunnelErrorCode Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode Unsigned32,
gmplsTunnelErrorTLVs OCTET STRING,
gmplsTunnelErrorHelpString SnmpAdminString
}
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
noError(0),
unknown(1),
protocol(2),
pathComputation(3),
localConfiguration(4),
localResources(5),
localOther(6)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The nature of the last error. Provides interpretation context
for gmplsTunnelErrorProtocolCode and
gmplsTunnelErrorProtocolSubcode.
A value of noError(0) shows that there is no error associated
with this tunnel and means that the other objects in this table
entry (conceptual row) have no meaning.
A value of unknown(1) shows that there is an error but that no
additional information about the cause is known. The error may
have been received in a signaled message or generated locally.
A value of protocol(2) or pathComputation(3) indicates the
cause of an error and identifies an error that has been received
through signaling or will itself be signaled.
A value of localConfiguration(4), localResources(5) or
localOther(6) identifies an error that has been detected
by the local node but that will not be reported through
signaling."
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 1 }
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The time at which the last error occurred. This is presented as
the value of SysUpTime when the error occurred or was reported
to this node.
If gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType has the value noError(0), then
this object is not valid and should be ignored.
Note that entries in this table are not persistent over system
resets or re-initializations of the management system."
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 2 }
gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressType
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The address type of the error reported.
This object is used to aid in interpretation of
gmplsTunnelErrorReporter."
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 3 }
gmplsTunnelErrorReporter OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The address of the node reporting the last error, or the address
of the resource (such as an interface) associated with the
error.
If gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType has the value noError(0), then
this object is not valid and should be ignored.
If gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType has the value unknown(1),
localConfiguration(4), localResources(5), or localOther(6),
this object MAY contain a zero value.
This object should be interpreted in the context of the value of
the object gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType."
REFERENCE
"1. Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses, RFC 4001,
section 4, Usage Hints."
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 4 }
gmplsTunnelErrorCode OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The primary error code associated with the last error.
The interpretation of this error code depends on the value of
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType. If the value of
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is noError(0), the value of this
object should be 0 and should be ignored. If the value of
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is protocol(2), the error should
be interpreted in the context of the signaling protocol
identified by the mplsTunnelSignallingProto object."
REFERENCE
"1. Resource ReserVation Protocol -- Version 1 Functional
Specification, RFC 2205, section B.
2. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
section 7.3.
3. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 13.1."
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 5 }
gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The secondary error code associated with the last error and the
protocol used to signal this tunnel. This value is interpreted
in the context of the value of gmplsTunnelErrorCode.
If the value of gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is noError(0), the
value of this object should be 0 and should be ignored."
REFERENCE
"1. Resource ReserVation Protocol -- Version 1 Functional
Specification, RFC 2205, section B.
2. RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, RFC 3209,
section 7.3.
3. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 13.1. "
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 6 }
gmplsTunnelErrorTLVs OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..65535))
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
DESCRIPTION
"The sequence of interface identifier TLVs reported with the
error by the protocol code. The interpretation of the TLVs and
the encoding within the protocol are described in the
references. A value of zero in the first octet indicates that no
TLVs are present."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions, RFC 3473,
section 8.2."
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 7 }
gmplsTunnelErrorHelpString OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A textual string containing information about the last error,
recovery actions, and support advice. If there is no help string,
this object contains a zero length string.
If the value of gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType is noError(0),
this object should contain a zero length string, but may contain
a help string indicating that there is no error."
::= { gmplsTunnelErrorEntry 8 }
--
-- Notifications
--
gmplsTunnelDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
mplsTunnelAdminStatus,
mplsTunnelOperStatus,
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporter,
gmplsTunnelErrorCode,
gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This notification is generated when an mplsTunnelOperStatus
object for a tunnel in the gmplsTunnelTable is about to enter
the down state from some other state (but not from the
notPresent state). This other state is indicated by the
included value of mplsTunnelOperStatus.
The objects in this notification provide additional error
information that indicates the reason why the tunnel has
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
transitioned to down(2).
Note that an implementation MUST only issue one of
mplsTunnelDown and gmplsTunnelDown for any single event on a
single tunnel. If the tunnel has an entry in the
gmplsTunnelTable, an implementation SHOULD use gmplsTunnelDown
for all tunnel-down events and SHOULD NOT use mplsTunnelDown.
This notification is subject to the control of
mplsTunnelNotificationEnable. When that object is set
to false(2), then the notification must not be issued.
Further, this notification is also subject to
mplsTunnelNotificationMaxRate. That object indicates the
maximum number of notifications issued per second. If events
occur more rapidly, the implementation may simply fail to emit
some notifications during that period, or may queue them until
an appropriate time. The notification rate applies to the sum
of all notifications in the MPLS-TE-STD-MIB and
GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB modules applied across the whole of the
reporting device.
mplsTunnelOperStatus, mplsTunnelAdminStatus, mplsTunnelDown,
mplsTunnelNotificationEnable, and mplsTunnelNotificationMaxRate
objects are found in MPLS-TE-STD-MIB."
REFERENCE
"1. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering
(TE) Management Information Base (MIB), RFC 3812."
::= { gmplsTeNotifications 1 }
gmplsTeGroups
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeConformance 1 }
gmplsTeCompliances
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { gmplsTeConformance 2 }
-- Compliance requirement for fully compliant implementations.
gmplsTeModuleFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Compliance statement for agents that provide full support for
GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB. Such devices can then be monitored and also
be configured using this MIB module.
The mandatory group has to be implemented by all LSRs that
originate, terminate, or act as transit for TE-LSPs/tunnels.
In addition, depending on the type of tunnels supported, other
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
groups become mandatory as explained below."
MODULE MPLS-TE-STD-MIB -- The MPLS-TE-STD-MIB, RFC 3812
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
mplsTunnelGroup,
mplsTunnelScalarGroup
}
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
gmplsTunnelGroup,
gmplsTunnelScalarGroup
}
GROUP gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup
DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for devices that support signaled
tunnel set up, in addition to gmplsTunnelGroup. The following
constraints apply:
mplsTunnelSignallingProto should be at least read-only
returning a value of ldp(2) or rsvp(3)."
GROUP gmplsTunnelOptionalGroup
DESCRIPTION
"Objects in this group are optional."
GROUP gmplsTeNotificationGroup
DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for those implementations that can
implement the notifications contained in this group."
::= { gmplsTeCompliances 1 }
-- Compliance requirement for read-only compliant implementations.
gmplsTeModuleReadOnlyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Compliance requirement for implementations that only provide
read-only support for GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB. Such devices can then be
monitored but cannot be configured using this MIB module."
MODULE -- this module
-- The mandatory group has to be implemented by all LSRs that
-- originate, terminate, or act as transit for TE-LSPs/tunnels.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
-- In addition, depending on the type of tunnels supported, other
-- groups become mandatory as explained below.
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
gmplsTunnelGroup,
gmplsTunnelScalarGroup
}
GROUP gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup
DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for devices that support signaled
tunnel set up, in addition to gmplsTunnelGroup. The following
constraints apply:
mplsTunnelSignallingProto should be at least read-only
returning a value of ldp(2) or rsvp(3)."
GROUP gmplsTunnelOptionalGroup
DESCRIPTION
"Objects in this group are optional."
GROUP gmplsTeNotificationGroup
DESCRIPTION
"This group is mandatory for those implementations that can
implement the notifications contained in this group."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelUnnumIf
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelAttributes
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelSwitchingType
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelLinkProtection
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelGPid
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelSecondary
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelDirection
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Only forward(0) is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelPathComp
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Only explicit(2) is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType
SYNTAX InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient
SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType
SYNTAX InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient
SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType
SYNTAX InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient
SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType
SYNTAX InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient
SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) sizes."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
-- gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses has max access read-only
OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
OBJECT gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
-- gmplsTunnelARHopTable
-- all objects have max access read-only
-- gmplsTunnelCHopTable
-- all objects have max access read-only
-- gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable
-- all objects have max access read-only
-- gmplsTunnelErrorTable
-- all objects have max access read-only
OBJECT gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType
SYNTAX InetAddressType { unknown(0), ipv4(1), ipv6(2) }
DESCRIPTION "Only unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2) support
is required."
OBJECT gmplsTunnelErrorReporter
SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE(0|4|16))
DESCRIPTION "An implementation is only required to support
unknown(0), ipv4(1), and ipv6(2)."
::= { gmplsTeCompliances 2 }
gmplsTunnelGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelDirection,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfPackets,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCPackets,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfErrors,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfBytes,
gmplsTunnelReversePerfHCBytes,
gmplsTunnelErrorLastErrorType,
gmplsTunnelErrorLastTime,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporterType,
gmplsTunnelErrorReporter,
gmplsTunnelErrorCode,
gmplsTunnelErrorSubcode,
gmplsTunnelErrorTLVs,
gmplsTunnelErrorHelpString,
gmplsTunnelUnnumIf
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
"Necessary, but not sufficient, set of objects to implement
tunnels. In addition, depending on the type of the tunnels
supported (for example, manually configured or signaled,
persistent or non-persistent, etc.), the
gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup group is mandatory."
::= { gmplsTeGroups 1 }
gmplsTunnelSignaledGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelAttributes,
gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding,
gmplsTunnelSwitchingType,
gmplsTunnelLinkProtection,
gmplsTunnelGPid,
gmplsTunnelSecondary,
gmplsTunnelPathComp,
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelUpstreamNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelSendResvNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelDownstreamNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType,
gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient,
gmplsTunnelAdminStatusFlags,
gmplsTunnelHopLabelStatuses,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabel,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabel,
gmplsTunnelHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Objects needed to implement signaled tunnels."
::= { gmplsTeGroups 2 }
gmplsTunnelScalarGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
gmplsTunnelsConfigured,
gmplsTunnelsActive
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Scalar objects needed to implement MPLS tunnels."
::= { gmplsTeGroups 3 }
gmplsTunnelOptionalGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
gmplsTunnelExtraParamsPtr,
gmplsTunnelARHopLabelStatuses,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabel,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabel,
gmplsTunnelARHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelARHopProtection,
gmplsTunnelCHopLabelStatuses,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabel,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitForwardLabelPtr,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabel,
gmplsTunnelCHopExplicitReverseLabelPtr
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The objects in this group are optional."
::= { gmplsTeGroups 4 }
gmplsTeNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS {
gmplsTunnelDown
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Set of notifications implemented in this module. None is
mandatory."
::= { gmplsTeGroups 5 }
END
9. Security Considerations
It is clear that the MIB modules described in this document in
association with MPLS-TE-STD-MIB [RFC3812] are potentially useful for
monitoring of MPLS and GMPLS tunnels. These MIB modules can also be
used for configuration of certain objects, and anything that can be
configured can be incorrectly configured, with potentially disastrous
results.
There are a number of management objects defined in these MIB modules
with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such
objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network
environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure
environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on
network operations. These are the tables and objects and their
sensitivity/vulnerability:
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
o the gmplsTunnelTable and gmplsTunnelHopTable collectively contain
objects to provision GMPLS tunnels interfaces at their ingress
LSRs. Unauthorized write access to objects in these tables could
result in disruption of traffic on the network. This is
especially true if a tunnel has already been established.
Some of the readable objects in these MIB modules (i.e., objects with
a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive
or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to
control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly
to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over
the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their
sensitivity/vulnerability:
o the gmplsTunnelTable, gmplsTunnelHopTable, gmplsTunnelARHopTable,
gmplsTunnelCHopTable, gmplsTunnelReversePerfTable, and
gmplsTunnelErrorTable collectively show the tunnel network
topology and status. If an administrator does not want to reveal
this information, then these tables should be considered
sensitive/vulnerable.
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec),
even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is
allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects
in these MIB modules.
It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as
provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8),
including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for
authentication and privacy).
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator
responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an
instance of this MIB module, is properly configured to give access to
the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate
rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
10. Acknowledgments
This document is a product of the CCAMP Working Group.
This document extends [RFC3812]. The authors would like to express
their gratitude to all those who worked on that earlier MIB document.
Thanks also to Tony Zinicola and Jeremy Crossen for their valuable
contributions during an early implementation, and to Lars Eggert,
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
Baktha Muralidharan, Tom Petch, Dan Romascanu, Dave Thaler, and Bert
Wijnen for their review comments.
Special thanks to Joan Cucchiara and Len Nieman for their help with
compilation issues.
Joan Cucchiara provided a helpful and very thorough MIB Doctor
review.
11. IANA Considerations
IANA has rooted MIB objects in the MIB modules contained in this
document according to the sections below.
11.1. IANA Considerations for GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB
IANA has rooted MIB objects in the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module contained
in this document under the mplsStdMIB subtree.
IANA has made the following assignments in the "NETWORK MANAGEMENT
PARAMETERS" registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/
smi-numbers in table:
...mib-2.transmission.mplsStdMIB (1.3.6.1.2.1.10.166)
Decimal Name References
------- ----- ----------
13 GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB [RFC4802]
In the future, GMPLS-related standards-track MIB modules should be
rooted under the mplsStdMIB (sic) subtree. IANA has been requested
to manage that namespace in the SMI Numbers registry [RFC3811]. New
assignments can only be made via a Standards Action as specified in
[RFC2434].
11.2. Dependence on IANA MIB Modules
Three MIB objects in the GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB module defined in this
document (gmplsTunnelLSPEncoding, gmplsTunnelSwitchingType, and
gmplsTunnelGPid) use textual conventions imported from the IANA-
GMPLS-TC-MIB module. The purpose of defining these textual
conventions in a separate MIB module is to allow additional values to
be defined without having to issue a new version of this document.
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is responsible for the
assignment of all Internet numbers; it will administer the values
associated with these textual conventions.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
The rules for additions or changes to IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB are outlined
in the DESCRIPTION clause associated with its MODULE-IDENTITY
statement.
The current version of IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB can be accessed from the
IANA home page at: http://www.iana.org/.
11.2.1. IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB Definition
This section provides the base definition of the IANA GMPLS TC MIB
module. This MIB module is under the direct control of IANA. Please
see the most updated version of this MIB at
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib>.
This MIB makes reference to the following documents: [RFC2578],
[RFC2579], [RFC3471], [RFC3473], [RFC4202], [RFC4328], and [RFC4783].
IANA assigned an OID to the IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB module specified in
this document as { mib-2 152 }.
IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- RFC 2578
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC; -- RFC 2579
ianaGmpls MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED
"200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
ORGANIZATION
"IANA"
CONTACT-INFO
"Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
Postal: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: +1 310 823 9358
E-Mail: iana@iana.org"
DESCRIPTION
"Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). The initial version
of this MIB module was published in RFC 4802. For full legal
notices see the RFC itself. Supplementary information
may be available on:
http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html"
REVISION
"200702270000Z" -- 27 February 2007 00:00:00 GMT
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version issued as part of RFC 4802."
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
::= { mib-2 152 }
IANAGmplsLSPEncodingTypeTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This type is used to represent and control
the LSP encoding type of an LSP signaled by a GMPLS
signaling protocol.
This textual convention is strongly tied to the LSP
Encoding Types sub-registry of the GMPLS Signaling
Parameters registry managed by IANA. Values should be
assigned by IANA in step with the LSP Encoding Types
sub-registry and using the same registry management rules.
However, the actual values used in this textual convention
are solely within the purview of IANA and do not
necessarily match the values in the LSP Encoding Types
sub-registry.
The definition of this textual convention with the
addition of newly assigned values is published
periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
Internet Network Management number assignments. (The
latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
IANA.)
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
email (iana@iana.org)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section
3.1.1.
2. Generalized MPLS Signalling Extensions for G.709 Optical
Transport Networks Control, RFC 4328, section 3.1.1."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
tunnelLspNotGmpls(0), -- GMPLS is not in use
tunnelLspPacket(1), -- Packet
tunnelLspEthernet(2), -- Ethernet
tunnelLspAnsiEtsiPdh(3), -- PDH
-- the value 4 is deprecated
tunnelLspSdhSonet(5), -- SDH or SONET
-- the value 6 is deprecated
tunnelLspDigitalWrapper(7), -- Digital Wrapper
tunnelLspLambda(8), -- Lambda
tunnelLspFiber(9), -- Fiber
-- the value 10 is deprecated
tunnelLspFiberChannel(11), -- Fiber Channel
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
tunnelDigitalPath(12), -- Digital Path
tunnelOpticalChannel(13) -- Optical Channel
}
IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This type is used to represent and
control the LSP switching type of an LSP signaled by a
GMPLS signaling protocol.
This textual convention is strongly tied to the Switching
Types sub-registry of the GMPLS Signaling Parameters
registry managed by IANA. Values should be assigned by
IANA in step with the Switching Types sub-registry and
using the same registry management rules. However, the
actual values used in this textual convention are solely
within the purview of IANA and do not necessarily match
the values in the Switching Types sub-registry.
The definition of this textual convention with the
addition of newly assigned values is published
periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
Internet Network Management number assignments. (The
latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
IANA.)
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
email (iana@iana.org)."
REFERENCE
"1. Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized
Multi-Protocol Label Switching, RFC 4202, section 2.4.
2. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section
3.1.1."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
unknown(0), -- none of the following, or not known
psc1(1), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 1
psc2(2), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 2
psc3(3), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 3
psc4(4), -- Packet-Switch-Capable 4
l2sc(51), -- Layer-2-Switch-Capable
tdm(100), -- Time-Division-Multiplex
lsc(150), -- Lambda-Switch-Capable
fsc(200) -- Fiber-Switch-Capable
}
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
IANAGmplsGeneralizedPidTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This data type is used to represent and control the LSP
Generalized Protocol Identifier (G-PID) of an LSP
signaled by a GMPLS signaling protocol.
This textual convention is strongly tied to the Generalized
PIDs (G-PID) sub-registry of the GMPLS Signaling Parameters
registry managed by IANA. Values should be assigned by
IANA in step with the Generalized PIDs (G-PID) sub-registry
and using the same registry management rules. However, the
actual values used in this textual convention are solely
within the purview of IANA and do not necessarily match the
values in the Generalized PIDs (G-PID) sub-registry.
The definition of this textual convention with the
addition of newly assigned values is published
periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
Internet Network Management number assignments. (The
latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
IANA.)
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
email (iana@iana.org)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section
3.1.1.
2. Generalized MPLS Signalling Extensions for G.709 Optical
Transport Networks Control, RFC 4328, section 3.1.3."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
unknown(0), -- unknown or none of the following
-- the values 1, 2, 3 and 4 are reserved in RFC 3471
asynchE4(5),
asynchDS3T3(6),
asynchE3(7),
bitsynchE3(8),
bytesynchE3(9),
asynchDS2T2(10),
bitsynchDS2T2(11),
reservedByRFC3471first(12),
asynchE1(13),
bytesynchE1(14),
bytesynch31ByDS0(15),
asynchDS1T1(16),
bitsynchDS1T1(17),
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
bytesynchDS1T1(18),
vc1vc12(19),
reservedByRFC3471second(20),
reservedByRFC3471third(21),
ds1SFAsynch(22),
ds1ESFAsynch(23),
ds3M23Asynch(24),
ds3CBitParityAsynch(25),
vtLovc(26),
stsSpeHovc(27),
posNoScramble16BitCrc(28),
posNoScramble32BitCrc(29),
posScramble16BitCrc(30),
posScramble32BitCrc(31),
atm(32),
ethernet(33),
sdhSonet(34),
digitalwrapper(36),
lambda(37),
ansiEtsiPdh(38),
lapsSdh(40),
fddi(41),
dqdb(42),
fiberChannel3(43),
hdlc(44),
ethernetV2DixOnly(45),
ethernet802dot3Only(46),
g709ODUj(47),
g709OTUk(48),
g709CBRorCBRa(49),
g709CBRb(50),
g709BSOT(51),
g709BSNT(52),
gfpIPorPPP(53),
gfpEthernetMAC(54),
gfpEthernetPHY(55),
g709ESCON(56),
g709FICON(57),
g709FiberChannel(58)
}
IANAGmplsAdminStatusInformationTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This data type determines the setting of the
Admin Status flags in the Admin Status object or TLV, as
described in RFC 3471. Setting this object to a non-zero
value will result in the inclusion of the Admin Status
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
object or TLV on signaling messages.
This textual convention is strongly tied to the
Administrative Status Information Flags sub-registry of
the GMPLS Signaling Parameters registry managed by IANA.
Values should be assigned by IANA in step with the
Administrative Status Flags sub-registry and using the
same registry management rules. However, the actual
values used in this textual convention are solely
within the purview of IANA and do not necessarily match
the values in the Administrative Status Information
Flags sub-registry.
The definition of this textual convention with the
addition of newly assigned values is published
periodically by the IANA, in either the Assigned
Numbers RFC, or some derivative of it specific to
Internet Network Management number assignments. (The
latest arrangements can be obtained by contacting the
IANA.)
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via
email (iana@iana.org)."
REFERENCE
"1. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Signaling Functional Description, RFC 3471, section 8.
2. Generalized MPLS Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions,
RFC 3473, section 7.
3. GMPLS - Communication of Alarm Information,
RFC 4783, section 3.2.1."
SYNTAX BITS {
reflect(0), -- Reflect bit (RFC 3471)
reserved1(1), -- reserved
reserved2(2), -- reserved
reserved3(3), -- reserved
reserved4(4), -- reserved
reserved5(5), -- reserved
reserved6(6), -- reserved
reserved7(7), -- reserved
reserved8(8), -- reserved
reserved9(9), -- reserved
reserved10(10), -- reserved
reserved11(11), -- reserved
reserved12(12), -- reserved
reserved13(13), -- reserved
reserved14(14), -- reserved
reserved15(15), -- reserved
reserved16(16), -- reserved
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
reserved17(17), -- reserved
reserved18(18), -- reserved
reserved19(19), -- reserved
reserved20(20), -- reserved
reserved21(21), -- reserved
reserved22(22), -- reserved
reserved23(23), -- reserved
reserved24(24), -- reserved
reserved25(25), -- reserved
reserved26(26), -- reserved
reserved27(27), -- Inhibit Alarm bit (RFC 4783)
reserved28(28), -- reserved
testing(29), -- Testing bit (RFC 3473)
administrativelyDown(30), -- Admin down (RFC 3473)
deleteInProgress(31) -- Delete bit (RFC 3473)
}
END
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2205] Braden, R., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., and S.
Jamin, "Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1
Functional Specification", RFC 2205, September 1997.
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,
"Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)",
STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual
Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,
"Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April
1999.
[RFC3031] Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A., and R. Callon, "Multiprotocol
Label Switching Architecture", RFC 3031, January 2001.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
[RFC3209] Awduche, D., Berger, L., Gan, D., Li, T., Srinivasan, V.,
and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP
Tunnels", RFC 3209, December 2001.
[RFC3411] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An
Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411,
December 2002.
[RFC3471] Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC 3471,
January 2003.
[RFC3473] Berger, L., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic
Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", RFC 3473, January 2003.
[RFC3477] Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Signalling Unnumbered Links
in Resource ReSerVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering
(RSVP-TE)", RFC 3477, January 2003.
[RFC3811] Nadeau, T. and J. Cucchiara, "Definitions of Textual
Conventions (TCs) for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Management", RFC 3811, June 2004.
[RFC3812] Srinivasan, C., Viswanathan, A., and T. Nadeau,
"Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering
(TE) Management Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3812, June
2004.
[RFC3813] Srinivasan, C., Viswanathan, A., and T. Nadeau,
"Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switching
Router (LSR) Management Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3813,
June 2004.
[RFC3945] Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945, October 2004.
[RFC4001] Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J.
Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network
Addresses", RFC 4001, February 2005.
[RFC4202] Kompella, K. and Y. Rekhter, "Routing Extensions in Support
of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)", RFC
4202, October 2005.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
[RFC4328] Papadimitriou, D., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for G.709 Optical
Transport Networks Control", RFC 4328, January 2006.
[RFC4783] Berger, L., "GMPLS - Communication of Alarm Information",
RFC 4783, December 2006.
[RFC4803] Nadeau, T., Ed. and A. Farrel, Ed., "Generalized
Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching
Router (LSR) Management Information Base", RFC 4803,
February 2007.
12.2. Informative References
[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.
[RFC3472] Ashwood-Smith, P. and L. Berger, "Generalized Multi-
Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Constraint-based
Routed Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP) Extensions",
RFC 3472, January 2003.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
Contact Information
Thomas D. Nadeau
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1414 Massachusetts Ave.
Boxborough, MA 01719
EMail: tnadeau@cisco.com
Cheenu Srinivasan
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Ave.
New York, NY 10022
Phone: +1-212-617-3682
EMail: cheenu@bloomberg.net
Adrian Farrel
Old Dog Consulting
Phone: +44-(0)-1978-860944
EMail: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Tim Hall
Data Connection Ltd.
100 Church Street
Enfield, Middlesex
EN2 6BQ, UK
Phone: +44 20 8366 1177
EMail: tim.hall@dataconnection.com
Ed Harrison
Data Connection Ltd.
100 Church Street
Enfield, Middlesex
EN2 6BQ, UK
Phone: +44 20 8366 1177
EMail: ed.harrison@dataconnection.com
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 4802 GMPLS TE MIB February 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Nadeau & Farrel Standards Track [Page 60]
Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/
